Skip to main content

Security report for anduril.com

Anduril Industries, Inc. · Government · United States

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Anduril Industries, Inc. is a prominent American defense technology company specializing in advanced autonomous systems and AI-powered defense platforms. The company focuses on transforming U.S. and allied military capabilities by delivering innovative products such as autonomous air vehicles, underwater vehicles, and AI sensor fusion systems. Their market position is strong, supported by strategic partnerships and sponsorships, including Ohio State Athletics and NASCAR, reflecting their commitment to innovation and community engagement. Technically, the website is built on modern frameworks such as Next.js and Sanity CMS, ensuring fast performance, mobile optimization, and good SEO practices. The infrastructure supports rich multimedia content and a professional user experience. Security posture is robust with HTTPS enforcement and comprehensive security headers, although there is room for improvement in privacy compliance mechanisms such as cookie consent. The security evaluation indicates a mature security posture with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. However, the absence of a dedicated security policy and incident response information suggests an opportunity to enhance transparency and readiness. Overall, the website and business demonstrate high credibility and trustworthiness, with consistent WHOIS data and clear corporate identity. Strategically, the company should focus on implementing explicit privacy and security policies, enhancing user consent mechanisms, and expanding contact information to include phone and physical addresses. These steps will further solidify trust and compliance in a highly regulated industry.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching anduril.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Anduril operates in the government and defense technology sector, leveraging rapid product development and private capital to disrupt traditional defense manufacturing. Their business model emphasizes delivering advanced autonomous systems and AI software platforms to military and allied customers. The company targets defense agencies and government entities, positioning itself as an innovative leader with a strong partnership ecosystem. Sponsorships and community investments indicate a growth-oriented strategy focused on brand building and workforce development. Revenue streams likely include product sales, government contracts, and technology licensing. The company maintains a large operational scale with advanced manufacturing capabilities and a focus on strategic competition readiness.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a strong security posture with HTTPS enabled and multiple security headers implemented, including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options. No sensitive data leakage or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the lack of a public security policy or incident response contact limits transparency. There is no evidence of a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file. Privacy compliance is partially addressed with a comprehensive privacy policy but lacks visible cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the security maturity is high but can be improved by formalizing incident response and vulnerability disclosure processes.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a visible cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page detailing procedures and contacts.
  3. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program and security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Expand contact information to include phone numbers and physical addresses for enhanced trust and communication.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Anduril Industries, Inc.
Description
Anduril Industries, Inc. is an American defense technology company that specializes in advanced autonomous systems.
Key services
Autonomous air systems, Underwater autonomous vehicles, AI-powered sensor platforms, Electronic warfare tools, Command and control software (Lattice)
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Sanity CMS, JavaScript, HTML5, CSS3
Frameworks
Next.js
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Security headers present
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries
  • No forms detected collecting sensitive data without protection

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with rich multimedia content including videos and images.
  2. Strong focus on defense technology products and autonomous systems.
  3. Clear navigation with detailed product and capability descriptions.
  4. Presence of official sponsorships and partnerships enhances credibility.
  5. No signs of malicious content or security issues detected.
  6. Limited presence of cookie consent or explicit privacy compliance banners.
  7. No visible contact phone numbers or physical addresses; only email contact provided.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including React and Next.js, supported by Sanity CMS for content management. The infrastructure supports fast loading times and excellent mobile responsiveness. SEO is well-implemented with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Accessibility features are present but could be further enhanced. Hosting appears to be on a performant platform, likely Vercel or similar. No technical debt or deprecated technologies were observed. The site uses multiple deferred JavaScript chunks for optimized loading. Overall, the technical implementation is modern, scalable, and aligned with best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with anduril.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review anduril.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.