Skip to main content

Security report for andoverglass.co.uk

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website at andoverglass.co.uk is currently a parked domain page hosted by GoDaddy, with no active business content or services presented. The domain WHOIS lookup failed due to domain naming rules violations, indicating the domain is either improperly registered or a subdomain rather than a standalone domain. The site contains minimal content, primarily advertising scripts from Google Adsense and a Trustpilot widget, but lacks any company branding, contact information, or business description. Technically, the site uses JavaScript and React-like structures, but the overall technical implementation is basic and limited to parking page functionality. There is no evidence of HTTPS or security headers, and no forms or data collection mechanisms are present. Privacy compliance is minimal, with only a basic privacy policy link that does not appear comprehensive or GDPR compliant. From a security perspective, the absence of HTTPS and security headers, combined with the lack of registrant data, results in a low security posture. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available. The domain's legitimacy is questionable due to WHOIS errors and lack of business presence. Overall, this domain appears to be inactive or reserved without an operational website. Strategic recommendations include securing proper domain registration, implementing HTTPS, adding business content and contact information, and establishing privacy and security policies to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching andoverglass.co.uk

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
25
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

No active business operations or market positioning can be determined from the current website content. The domain is parked and does not provide any services or products. There are no indications of revenue streams, partnerships, or target customer segments. The domain appears to be held by an individual or entity without active use, limiting any business intelligence insights.

Security posture

The security posture is weak due to the lack of HTTPS, absence of security headers, and no visible security or incident response policies. The domain registration is inconsistent and lacks transparency, which further reduces trustworthiness. No vulnerabilities are explicitly detected, but the minimal technical setup and lack of security best practices present risks if the domain were to be used actively without improvements.

Recommendations

  1. Register the domain properly with valid WHOIS information to establish legitimacy.
  2. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure communications.
  3. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance.
  4. Publish clear business information including contact details and security policies.
  5. Add security headers and conduct regular security assessments to improve posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
The domain andoverglass.co.uk is parked free courtesy of GoDaddy.com. No business content or description is present.
Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Trustpilot widget, Google Adsense, WSIMG parking-lander scripts
Frameworks
React (implied)
Platforms
GoDaddy Parking
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Adsense
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is a parked domain page with no business content
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to domain naming rules violation
  3. No contact or business information present
  4. No security headers or HTTPS information available
  5. Contains advertising scripts from Google Adsense and Trustpilot widget
  6. No privacy or cookie policy except a basic privacy policy link with no real content
  7. No forms or data collection elements detected
  8. No social media or company contact information found
  9. Website content is minimal and not representative of an active business
Technical notes

Notes

The website is a simple parked domain page using JavaScript and React-like markup, served by GoDaddy's parking platform. It includes advertising scripts from Google Adsense and a Trustpilot widget. The site lacks HTTPS and security headers, and no CMS or advanced platform is detected. Performance is moderate given the minimal content. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic. SEO optimization is poor due to lack of meaningful content and metadata.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with andoverglass.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review andoverglass.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.