Skip to main content

Security report for andmik.ee

Andmik · Government · Estonia

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Andmik is a specialized platform focused on providing data visualization and budget tracking services for Estonian municipalities. The website presents detailed geographic and demographic data for various local governments, targeting municipal officials and stakeholders. The platform leverages modern web technologies including Vue.js and Leaflet for interactive maps, supported by Google Analytics and Tag Manager for user tracking. The domain is registered with a reputable Estonian registrar, Zone Media OÜ, and was created in 2021, aligning with the platform's apparent recent launch. Technically, the website employs a modern JavaScript framework and mapping libraries, ensuring a responsive and interactive user experience. However, there is room for improvement in accessibility and SEO optimization. Security-wise, the site lacks visible security headers and does not enable DNSSEC, which could be enhanced to improve overall security posture. Privacy compliance is weak, with no visible privacy or cookie policies, and no consent mechanisms, which is a significant gap given the use of tracking technologies. Overall, the website is functional and professionally designed but requires improvements in privacy compliance, security best practices, and contact transparency to enhance trust and regulatory adherence. Strategic recommendations include implementing comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, enabling DNSSEC, adding security headers, and providing clear contact and incident response information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching andmik.ee

This scan found 30 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
30
Email security
40
DNS health
45
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Andmik operates within the government sector, providing a niche service focused on municipal data visualization and budget tracking in Estonia. Its business model likely revolves around servicing local governments or related entities with data-driven insights. The platform's competitive advantage lies in its specialized focus and integration of geographic data with budgetary information. The target customers are municipal officials and government bodies. The platform's growth potential depends on expanding municipality participation and enhancing data services. The partnership ecosystem is not explicitly detailed, but the use of external services like Google Analytics indicates some integration with common digital tools. Overall, Andmik appears to be a focused, small-scale government service provider with a clear market niche.

Security posture

The current security posture of the website is moderate but has notable gaps. HTTPS is presumably enabled (implied by external scripts loaded over HTTPS), but no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, or Strict-Transport-Security are detected, which are important for mitigating common web attacks. DNSSEC is not enabled, which could expose the domain to DNS spoofing risks. No explicit incident response or security policy information is provided, and no dedicated security contact channels are visible. The use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager introduces moderate user tracking but without visible privacy controls or consent mechanisms, raising compliance concerns. There are no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data in the HTML content. Overall, the site would benefit from enhanced security configurations and transparency to improve its security maturity.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security.
  3. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Provide clear contact information including security incident response contacts (e.g., security@ or abuse@ emails).
  5. Introduce cookie consent mechanisms to inform users about tracking and obtain consent.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Andmik
Description
Andmik appears to be a platform related to Estonian municipalities, providing data visualization and budget fulfillment information for various local governments.
Key services
Municipality data visualization, Budget fulfillment tracking
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Vue.js, Leaflet, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Vue.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a data visualization platform for Estonian municipalities.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No explicit contact information or security policies provided.
  4. Uses modern JavaScript frameworks and mapping libraries.
  5. Includes Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking.
  6. Domain is registered with a reputable Estonian registrar and is relatively new.
  7. No WAF or blocking detected; site content is fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Vue.js, a modern JavaScript framework, and Leaflet for interactive mapping, indicating a contemporary front-end technology stack. It uses Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking. The site prefetches and preloads multiple CSS and JS chunks, suggesting modular and optimized resource loading. Hosting appears to be managed via Zone Media OÜ, an Estonian registrar and hosting provider. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization but basic accessibility and SEO features. There is no detected CMS, indicating a custom or static site build. Technical risks include lack of DNSSEC and missing security headers, which could impact operational security and trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with andmik.ee. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review andmik.ee.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.