Skip to main content

Security report for andimar-j.lv

SIA "ANDIMAR-J" · Other · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

44/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA "ANDIMAR-J" is a Latvian small business specializing in printing services including prepress, offset and digital printing, and post-processing such as folding, stapling, and binding. The company targets businesses and individuals needing marketing materials and printed products. The website is professionally designed with clear navigation and good content quality, reflecting a focused business model in the printing sector. Technically, the site uses Bootstrap, jQuery, Google Fonts, and Google Maps API, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. However, the absence of privacy and cookie policies and lack of security headers highlight compliance and security gaps. The security posture is moderate with HTTPS usage but missing advanced security headers and incident response information. Overall, the website is trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching andimar-j.lv

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
10
Average
44

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the printing and marketing materials sector, serving local clients in Latvia. Its business model is service-oriented, providing customized printing solutions. The website content and contact information suggest a legitimate and established small business founded in 2014. The absence of social media presence and limited external partnerships indicate a focused but possibly limited market reach. The use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager suggests some level of marketing and user behavior tracking. The company maintains clear contact details and legal identifiers, supporting business credibility.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, which is mandatory for secure communications. However, no security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options were detected, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. There is no visible privacy policy or cookie consent mechanism, indicating potential GDPR compliance issues. No incident response or security contact information is provided. The use of third-party scripts like Google Analytics introduces moderate user tracking. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires improvements in headers, privacy compliance, and incident response readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Provide clear incident response and security contact information on the website.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to avoid vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO optimization for better user experience and reach.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA "ANDIMAR-J"
VAT number
LV50103806091
Registration number
50103806091
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA "ANDIMAR-J"
Description
Tipogrāfija Andimar-j offers a wide range of printing services including prepress, offset and digital printing, and post-processing such as folding, stapling, cutting, laminating, and binding. They provide customized solutions based on client needs and preferences.
Key services
Prepress (layout, file checking, print preparation), Printing (offset and digital), Post-processing (folding, stapling, cutting, laminating, binding, packaging)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, jQuery, Google Fonts, Google Maps API, Font Awesome
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL https://)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF detected.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
  3. Website content is professional and focused on printing services.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided with company details.
  5. No privacy or cookie policy found, indicating compliance gaps.
  6. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are used for tracking.
  7. No security headers detected in HTML content.
  8. Site uses modern frontend technologies like Bootstrap and jQuery.
  9. Google Maps API integrated for location display.
  10. No social media links found on the site.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern frontend stack including Bootstrap and jQuery, with integration of Google Fonts and Google Maps API for enhanced user experience. The site loads moderately fast and is mobile optimized. However, there is no detected CMS, suggesting a custom or static site. The lack of security headers and privacy compliance features indicates technical debt in security and compliance areas. The site uses Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking, which requires proper privacy disclosures. Overall, the technical infrastructure is adequate for a small business but can be improved for security, compliance, and SEO.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with andimar-j.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review andimar-j.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.