Skip to main content

Security report for andelemandele.lv

SIA MUDIA · E-commerce · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Andele Mandele is a prominent Latvian e-commerce platform specializing in a wide range of products including fashion, home goods, and transport-related items. It serves as a marketplace and community portal with extensive user engagement features such as forums, events, and blogs. The platform is well-established in the Latvian market, targeting local and Baltic consumers with a medium-sized business footprint. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including Vue.js, Google services, and multiple advertising and analytics integrations, demonstrating a mature digital infrastructure. Security-wise, the site uses strong TLS protocols, has a strict DMARC policy, and implements a comprehensive consent management platform ensuring GDPR compliance. However, there are areas for improvement such as enabling HSTS, OCSP stapling, and DNSSEC to enhance security further. No explicit security policy or incident response information is publicly available, which could be addressed to improve trust. Overall, the platform shows a high level of professionalism and trustworthiness with extensive advertising and tracking practices managed transparently through user consent mechanisms.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of andelemandele.lv. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching andelemandele.lv

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
70
Email security
75
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention andelemandele.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
240
Employees
0
Customers
240
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

3 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for andelemandele.lv.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Brand lookalikes

Add-on

Domains that imitate andelemandele.lv and could be used for phishing or spoofed email, tracked in OffSeq Breach.

Tracked
2
Registered
2
Resolving
2
High or critical
0

Last checked 2026-06-19

Masked preview

  • an••••.mandele.lvLowsubdomain
  • an•••••••••.le.lvNot ratedsubdomain

See the full lookalike list

A one-off add-on that lists up to 20 of the highest-risk lookalikes of andelemandele.lv with registration, mail-server, certificate and DNS signals.

Select it in the checkout above.

Lookalike data refreshes continuously. Monitoring on Breach alerts you when a variant is registered, gains a mail server or starts serving HTTPS.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates an extensive online marketplace with over 289,000 items, serving diverse categories and a broad user base. It leverages a community-driven model with user profiles, ratings, and social features, enhancing engagement and retention. The business model is primarily transactional with additional revenue from advertising and partnerships with numerous ad networks and marketing platforms. The presence of mobile apps across major platforms indicates a strategic focus on multi-channel accessibility. The company maintains a strong market position in Latvia and the Baltic region, supported by consistent branding and a comprehensive product catalog. Partnerships with major payment providers and ad networks further strengthen its ecosystem. Growth indicators include active user statistics and frequent product updates. The company appears to prioritize compliance and user privacy through a robust consent management framework.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with valid SSL certificates supporting TLS 1.3 and 1.2, absence of known SSL vulnerabilities, and a strict DMARC policy set to reject unauthorized emails. SPF records are correctly configured, reducing email spoofing risks. However, the lack of HSTS, OCSP stapling, and DNSSEC indicates potential areas for enhancement in transport and DNS security. The extensive use of third-party ad and analytics vendors introduces a broad attack surface, mitigated by a comprehensive consent management platform that aligns with GDPR requirements. No explicit security policy or incident response contacts are found, which may impact the site's ability to handle security incidents transparently. Overall, the security measures are solid but could benefit from additional best practices and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Enable HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with includeSubDomains and preload to enforce HTTPS.
  2. Implement OCSP stapling to improve SSL certificate revocation checks and reduce latency.
  3. Deploy DNSSEC to protect against DNS spoofing and enhance domain security.
  4. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  5. Regularly review and audit third-party vendor integrations to minimize privacy and security risks.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Vue.js with extensive third-party integrations for advertising and analytics. It uses Google Tag Manager, Gemius, and multiple ad networks. SSL is valid with TLS 1.3 and 1.2 but lacks HSTS and OCSP stapling. DNS is managed by hostnet.lv without DNSSEC. Performance is slow with many resources. Mobile optimization and SEO are good. A comprehensive consent management platform is implemented. No explicit security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 70/100Medium27 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with andelemandele.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review andelemandele.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.