Skip to main content

Security report for anchorfluidsystems.com

Anchor Fluid Systems · Manufacturing · N/a

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in Email security.

Security score

82/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Anchor Fluid Systems operates as a specialized manufacturer focusing on hydraulic hoses, couplings, and ferrules for industrial fluid systems. The company targets industrial and commercial customers requiring high-quality hydraulic components. The website reflects a medium-sized manufacturing business with a consistent brand presence and professional content. Technically, the site is built on Adobe Experience Manager CMS, integrating modern tools such as Google Tag Manager and OneTrust for cookie consent, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The website is accessible, mobile-optimized, and provides a clear navigation structure, although some SEO and accessibility features could be improved. Security posture is moderate; while HTTPS is implied, no explicit security headers or incident response policies are published. The absence of WHOIS registration data is a significant concern, impacting domain legitimacy and trust. Overall, the site is professional but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching anchorfluidsystems.com

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
70
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
82

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a niche manufacturer in the hydraulic components sector, offering hoses, couplings, and ferrules. The business model centers on product manufacturing and sales to industrial clients. The website's content quality and navigation suggest a focus on user experience for technical buyers. The lack of direct contact emails or phone numbers may indicate a preference for controlled communication via contact forms. The integration of OneTrust and Google Tag Manager shows awareness of privacy and marketing needs. However, the missing WHOIS data raises questions about domain ownership and longevity, which could affect customer trust and partnership opportunities.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, which are positive security indicators. However, no security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options were detected, which are best practices to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. There is no publicly available security policy, incident response contact, or vulnerability disclosure program, limiting transparency and preparedness. The absence of WHOIS registration data is a critical security and trust concern, as it may indicate domain registration issues or privacy obfuscation. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires improvements in header implementation, policy publication, and domain registration transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.
  2. Publish a clear privacy policy and terms of service pages accessible from the website footer or header.
  3. Establish and publicize an incident response policy and vulnerability disclosure program, including a security.txt file.
  4. Ensure WHOIS registration data is accurate, complete, and publicly available to improve domain legitimacy and trust.
  5. Enhance accessibility compliance and SEO optimization to improve user experience and search engine visibility.

Contact details published on the site

VAT number
IT 11069880158
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Anchor Fluid Systems
Description
Designs and manufactures hoses, couplings, and ferrules for hydraulic and fluid systems applications.
Key services
Hydraulic hoses, Couplings, Ferrules
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, OneTrust Cookie Consent, jQuery (implied by legacy scripts), Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) CMS
Frameworks
Adobe Experience Manager
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
OneTrust
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms
  2. WHOIS data is missing, indicating possible domain registration issues
  3. Site uses Adobe Experience Manager CMS and integrates OneTrust for cookie consent
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages detected
  5. Contact information is limited to a contact page with a form, no direct emails or phone numbers found
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found
  7. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts found
  8. Site content is professional and focused on hydraulic hose and coupling manufacturing
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Adobe Experience Manager CMS, a robust enterprise platform. It uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and OneTrust for cookie consent, reflecting modern marketing and privacy practices. The site includes responsive design elements and basic accessibility features. Performance appears moderate, with some reliance on external resources such as scene7 image hosting and Google Maps API. There is no evidence of outdated or vulnerable libraries in the provided HTML. However, the absence of security headers and incomplete WHOIS data represent technical risks that could impact business operations and trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with anchorfluidsystems.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review anchorfluidsystems.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.