Skip to main content

Security report for anapo.pt

ANAPO - ASSOCIAÇÃO NACIONAL DOS AVICULTORES PRODUTORES DE OVOS · Other · Portugal

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ANAPO is a Portuguese non-profit association dedicated to representing and defending the egg production sector in Portugal. The website serves as an informational and promotional platform targeting egg producers, industry stakeholders, and consumers interested in egg production, legislation, and benefits. The organization holds a key position in the national market as a sector representative, providing guidance and resources related to egg production and legislation. Technically, the website is built using the Laravel framework and incorporates modern web technologies such as Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection, FontAwesome for icons, and simpleParallax.js for visual effects. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO practices and moderate performance. It uses HTTPS with a valid SSL configuration, ensuring secure communications. From a security perspective, the site demonstrates good practices including HTTPS enforcement, CSRF token usage, and a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR. However, it lacks explicit security headers and formal security or incident response policies. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The WHOIS data aligns with the website's claims, supporting legitimacy and trustworthiness. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with privacy regulations, though it could benefit from enhanced security policies and headers to improve its security posture further.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching anapo.pt

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
40
Average
43

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ANAPO operates as a non-profit association within the agricultural sector, specifically focusing on egg production in Portugal. Its market positioning is strong as a national representative body, providing advocacy, education, and regulatory guidance. The business model centers on membership and sector representation rather than commercial sales. The target audience includes egg producers, regulatory bodies, and consumers interested in egg products. The website supports growth by disseminating information and promoting sector benefits. Partnerships include the technology provider Sistema4, which developed the website. The association maintains a social media presence to engage stakeholders and enhance visibility.

Security posture

The website exhibits a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is properly implemented, and CSRF tokens protect forms. Google reCAPTCHA is used to mitigate automated abuse. A cookie consent banner ensures GDPR compliance. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are published, which limits transparency and preparedness. No exposed sensitive data or known vulnerabilities were found. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the organization's risk profile but could be improved by formalizing policies and adding security headers.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a formal security policy and incident response plan accessible on the website.
  2. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize privacy risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ANAPO - ASSOCIAÇÃO NACIONAL DOS AVICULTORES PRODUTORES DE OVOS
Description
A ANAPO é uma associação sem fins lucrativos que conquistou um papel determinante para o desenvolvimento da produção de ovos em Portugal, representando e defendendo o setor.
Key services
Representation of egg producers, Information dissemination about egg production, Legislation guidance, Promotion of egg consumption
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google reCAPTCHA, FontAwesome, jQuery, simpleParallax.js
Frameworks
Laravel
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • CSRF token present in meta tags
  • Google reCAPTCHA implemented on forms
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Content is professionally presented and relevant to the egg production sector
  3. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant
  4. No terms of service or explicit security policies found
  5. Contact information is clearly provided with email and phone
  6. Use of modern web technologies and frameworks
  7. Security best practices partially implemented but could be improved
  8. Social media presence on Facebook and LinkedIn
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Laravel PHP framework, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and simpleParallax.js for UI effects. Google reCAPTCHA integration enhances bot protection. The site uses FontAwesome for icons and includes structured data in JSON-LD format for SEO. The design is responsive and mobile-friendly, with good navigation clarity. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or framework-based implementation. Hosting provider details were not identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid with room for optimization in performance and accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with anapo.pt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review anapo.pt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.