Skip to main content

Security report for anamnesia.com

Anamnesia · Other · France

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Anamnesia is a specialized French company providing innovative interactive, multimedia, and audiovisual solutions for museums and exhibitions. With over 15 years of experience and a portfolio of more than 100 projects, the company positions itself as a trusted partner in the cultural sector, offering end-to-end services from feasibility studies to content adaptation and technology integration. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, targeting museum professionals and cultural institutions. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins such as Gravity Forms and Yoast SEO, ensuring good SEO and user experience. Security measures include HTTPS, reCAPTCHA on forms, and GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanisms. However, there is room for improvement in security headers and explicit security policies. Overall, the domain registration data aligns well with the business claims, reinforcing trust and legitimacy.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching anamnesia.com

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
35
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Anamnesia operates in the niche market of museum technology and multimedia services, leveraging a service-based business model focused on custom project delivery. Its competitive advantage lies in its extensive experience, multidisciplinary expertise, and partnerships with related companies in the museum and digital sectors. The company targets cultural institutions seeking to enhance visitor engagement through technology. The website's content and structure support lead generation via contact forms and detailed service descriptions. The partnership ecosystem includes Museum Manufactory, Imki, and Lézard Graphique, enhancing its market reach and capabilities. The company demonstrates a stable market presence with consistent branding and professional digital assets.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and use of Google reCAPTCHA to protect contact forms from spam. Cookie consent is managed via tarteaucitron.js, ensuring GDPR compliance. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and DNSSEC for the domain are areas for enhancement. There is no published security policy or incident response contact, which could improve transparency and readiness. Overall, the security posture is good but could benefit from additional hardening and formalized policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy page and provide incident response contact information to enhance trust and compliance.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to minimize vulnerability exposure.
  5. Consider adding a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
ANAMNESIA
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Anamnesia
Description
Anamnesia conçoit et réalise des espaces et dispositifs de médiation interactifs, multimédias et audiovisuels pour musées et expositions, accompagnant la conception, la production et le déploiement de projets muséographiques.
Key services
Assistance, Studies and feasibility, Content adaptation and expertise, Production and integration of new technologies
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.5.2, Gravity Forms plugin, Yoast SEO plugin, tarteaucitron.js (cookie consent), Google reCAPTCHA v2 invisible, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics (gtag.js), jQuery 3.5.1, FSLightbox, Various CSS frameworks and custom styles
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA on contact form
  • Cookie consent with explicit allow/deny options
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Form file upload restrictions and validation

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (gtag.js)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well maintained.
  2. Clear focus on museum and exhibition multimedia solutions.
  3. Strong GDPR compliance with cookie consent and privacy policy.
  4. Contact form secured with reCAPTCHA and file upload restrictions.
  5. No signs of suspicious or malicious content.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices.
  7. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and business history.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform with well-known plugins such as Gravity Forms for form management and Yoast SEO for search engine optimization. The use of tarteaucitron.js indicates attention to cookie management and privacy compliance. The site loads external resources from reputable CDNs and Google services, ensuring performance and reliability. The design is responsive and optimized for mobile devices, with good accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in caching and resource optimization. The technical stack is appropriate for the business needs, with no significant technical debt or outdated components detected.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with anamnesia.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review anamnesia.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.