Skip to main content

Security report for analytika.no

Analytika · Other · Norway

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Analytika is a small Norwegian business specializing in management consulting and venture capital investments. The company positions itself as an innovative environment combining senior resources in business consulting and venture investments, targeting businesses seeking these services. The website is built using Angular framework and integrates Google Analytics for user tracking. The technical infrastructure appears modern but lacks visible advanced hosting or CMS details. Security posture is moderate with no detected security headers and unknown SSL configuration, and the absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps. The domain WHOIS data is unavailable, which reduces trustworthiness and raises questions about domain registration status. Overall, the website is professional and functional but requires improvements in security and privacy compliance to enhance trust and reduce risk.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching analytika.no

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Analytika operates in a niche market combining consulting and venture capital, likely generating revenue from consulting fees and investment returns. The company targets Norwegian businesses or investors interested in management consulting and venture capital. The website content is consistent and professional but lacks detailed business information such as founding year or certifications. The absence of social media presence and limited contact details may limit outreach. The use of Google Analytics and modern web technologies indicates a moderate level of digital maturity. The lack of WHOIS data and privacy policies suggests areas for operational improvement and risk mitigation.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS (implied by external script URLs using https), but no security headers were detected in the provided data, which is a security best practice gap. No forms or input fields were found, reducing attack surface but also limiting user interaction. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations. No incident response or security contact information is provided. The use of Google Analytics introduces moderate user tracking, but no explicit consent mechanism was found. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires enhancements in headers, policies, and transparency to improve compliance and reduce risk.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance details and consent mechanisms.
  3. Verify and ensure SSL/TLS configuration is strong and enforce HTTPS site-wide.
  4. Add clear contact information for security incidents and data protection officer if applicable.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability assessments to identify and remediate risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Analytika
Description
Analytika is an innovative environment where senior resources combine business consulting and venture investments.
Key services
Management consulting, Venture capital
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Angular 5.2.11, Google Analytics, Pixi.js
Frameworks
Angular
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with no blocking or WAF detected.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable, which is unusual and reduces domain trust.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the website.
  4. Contact information is limited to email and physical address; no phone numbers found.
  5. Website uses Angular framework and includes Google Analytics for tracking.
  6. No security headers detected in provided data; SSL status unknown.
  7. No forms detected on the homepage or main content.
  8. No social media links found in the HTML content.
  9. Content is professional and consistent with business consulting and venture capital services.
  10. No certifications or security policies disclosed.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Angular 5.2.11, a somewhat dated version of Angular, indicating potential for modernization. It uses Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking and Pixi.js for graphics rendering. The site appears to be a single-page application with client-side routing. Performance is moderate with no explicit hosting provider identified. Mobile optimization is good based on viewport meta tag and responsive design elements. Accessibility features are basic with no ARIA roles or landmarks detected in the provided HTML snippet. SEO optimization is basic with a title tag but no meta description or Open Graph tags found. No CMS or backend platform is identified. Overall, the technical implementation is functional but could benefit from updates and enhancements in SEO, accessibility, and modernization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with analytika.no. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review analytika.no.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.