Skip to main content

Security report for analincest.com

Danesco Trading Ltd. · Other · N/a

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AnalIncest.com is an adult entertainment website specializing in explicit anal incest-themed videos featuring taboo family role-play scenarios. The site offers a large catalog of videos, primarily targeting adults interested in niche taboo content. The business operates under Danesco Trading Ltd., with domain registration dating back to 2015, indicating a stable presence in the adult content market. Technically, the site uses common web technologies such as jQuery and Swiper.js, with Cloudflare DNS services but lacks advanced security configurations like DNSSEC and security headers. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are present, and no contact or incident response information is provided, which negatively impacts compliance and trust. Advertising is integrated via multiple third-party ad networks, some of which serve adult-related ads. Overall, the site is accessible without WAF or blocking mechanisms but exhibits basic technical and security maturity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching analincest.com

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website occupies a niche market segment focusing on taboo anal incest content, catering exclusively to adults. Its business model relies on video streaming and advertising revenue, with cross-promotion of partner adult sites. The lack of clear privacy and security policies, as well as absence of contact information, suggests a low emphasis on regulatory compliance and customer trust. The domain age and registrar information are consistent with the business claims, but the presence of suspicious linked domains related to extreme adult content may pose reputational risks. The site’s technical infrastructure is basic, with room for modernization and security improvements. The partner ecosystem includes multiple adult sites, indicating a networked business approach.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is basic and lacks several best practices. While HTTPS is enabled, no DNSSEC is configured, and no security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS are detected. The absence of privacy and cookie policies, as well as lack of incident response contacts, indicates poor compliance with data protection regulations like GDPR. No evidence of vulnerability disclosure or security certifications is found. The site does not appear to use advanced security frameworks or incident response mechanisms. These gaps increase the risk of data exposure and reduce user trust. Recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, implementing security headers, publishing privacy and cookie policies, and providing clear security incident contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to improve domain security and prevent DNS spoofing.
  2. Implement essential security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and enhance user trust.
  4. Provide clear contact information for security incidents and general inquiries to improve transparency and incident response readiness.
  5. Conduct a security audit to identify and remediate potential vulnerabilities and improve overall security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Danesco Trading Ltd.
Description
Anal Incest is a popular adult porn website offering explicit anal incest-themed videos featuring stepsisters, stepbrothers, and family role-play scenarios. It provides a large catalog of videos including amateur and professional content, with sorting and playlist features.
Key services
Streaming explicit adult videos, Video categorization and search, User playlists and sharing, Advertising adult-related products and services
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Swiper.js, Cloudflare DNS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
showmeyouradsnow.com, creativesumo.com, iyalc.com
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website hosts explicit adult content focused on taboo incest themes.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or social media links provided.
  4. Uses Cloudflare DNS but no DNSSEC enabled.
  5. No security headers detected in the HTML content.
  6. Multiple external adult and potentially suspicious domains linked.
  7. Advertising is present via multiple ad iframes from third-party ad networks.
  8. Site uses jQuery and Swiper.js for UI components.
  9. No structured data (JSON-LD or Open Graph) found in the HTML.
  10. Site content is accessible with no WAF or blocking detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a basic technology stack including jQuery and Swiper.js for UI interactions. It relies on Cloudflare for DNS services but does not utilize DNSSEC, which is a missed opportunity for enhanced security. The site’s HTML is valid and includes meta tags for viewport and description but lacks structured data such as JSON-LD or Open Graph tags, limiting SEO effectiveness. Performance appears moderate with no explicit indicators of optimization or caching strategies. Mobile optimization is basic, with responsive meta tags but no advanced accessibility features detected. The site includes multiple third-party ad iframes, which may impact load times and user experience. Overall, the technical implementation is functional but could benefit from modernization and improved SEO and accessibility practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with analincest.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review analincest.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.