Skip to main content

Security report for analdin.com

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 3 other checks.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.analdin.com operates as an adult entertainment platform offering free HD pornographic videos. It targets adult users seeking free streaming content in the adult niche. The business model appears to be advertising-supported, with no evident subscription or paid services. The site’s market position is niche and small scale, focusing on free adult video content. Technically, the site uses common web technologies including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, reCAPTCHA, and Yandex Metrika for analytics and tracking. The design is basic but mobile responsive, with moderate performance and SEO optimization. Security posture is weak, with no detected security headers or advanced protections, and no visible SSL/TLS configuration details. Privacy compliance is poor, lacking privacy and cookie policies or consent mechanisms. Business credibility is low due to absence of WHOIS registration data, contact information, and legal disclosures. Overall, the site presents significant transparency and trust issues, with a high risk profile due to missing domain registration data and lack of compliance documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

  4. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Weak SPF Policy

      SPF record has permissive policy allowing any server to send email

      What to do: Use -all or ~all qualifier for better email security

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching analdin.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Security headers
35
Email security
60
DNS health
65
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
68
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The site operates in the adult entertainment sector, providing free streaming of pornographic videos. Its revenue likely derives from advertising and possibly affiliate marketing, though no explicit affiliate programs were identified. The target audience is adult consumers of free adult content. The lack of business and legal information, including registrant data and contact details, limits the ability to assess competitive advantages or growth indicators. The site uses multiple third-party analytics and tracking tools, indicating some level of digital marketing sophistication. However, the absence of privacy and terms policies suggests limited regulatory compliance. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the data.

Security posture

Security maturity is low. The site lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, or X-Content-Type-Options. SSL/TLS configuration could not be assessed from the data. No incident response or security policy information is provided. The site uses reCAPTCHA, which is a positive control against automated abuse. Extensive use of third-party analytics and tracking scripts increases the attack surface and privacy risks. The absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy and potential abuse. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content, but the lack of transparency and security best practices is a concern. Compliance with GDPR or other data protection regulations is not evident.

Recommendations

  1. Register the domain properly and ensure WHOIS data is accurate and publicly available to improve trust.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  3. Implement standard security headers and verify SSL/TLS configuration to enhance security posture.
  4. Provide clear contact information and incident response channels to improve business credibility and security readiness.
  5. Regularly audit and minimize third-party scripts to reduce privacy risks and improve performance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Analdin HD Free Porn Movies
Key services
Free streaming of adult pornographic videos
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, reCAPTCHA, Yandex Metrika, jQuery, Magnific Popup, Fancybox, Slick Slider, Pushy
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Yandex Metrika
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Yandex Metrika
Marketing tools
Yandex Metrika
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is an adult content streaming platform with free HD porn videos
  2. No WHOIS registration data available, indicating possible unregistered domain or privacy protection
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site
  4. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses provided
  5. Uses multiple third-party analytics and tracking scripts
  6. No visible security headers or advanced security measures detected
  7. Mobile responsive design is implemented but overall design and content quality is basic
  8. No business or legal information disclosed
  9. Potential risk due to lack of transparency and missing WHOIS data
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of JavaScript libraries and analytics tools including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Yandex Metrika, reCAPTCHA, Magnific Popup, Fancybox, Slick Slider, and Pushy for UI and tracking. The site is mobile responsive with basic SEO meta tags. The HTML and CSS appear valid and structured, but no advanced frameworks or CMS were detected. Hosting provider and infrastructure details are not available. Performance is moderate with some optimization for mobile devices. Accessibility features are basic, with room for improvement. The site lacks visible security headers and privacy compliance features. Overall, the technical implementation is functional but basic, with opportunities for modernization and security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with analdin.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review analdin.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.