Skip to main content

Security report for anafra.eu

ANAFRA a.s. · Technology · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ANAFRA a.s. is a Czech-based IT services company specializing in IT infrastructure solutions including virtual private servers, hosting, colocation, cloud storage via Nextcloud, IT management, and hardware sales with a focus on Supermicro systems. Established in 2006, the company positions itself as a trusted system integrator and IT partner for businesses requiring tailored IT solutions. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear navigation and multilingual support, targeting business and IT professional audiences. Technically, the site employs modern tracking and marketing technologies such as Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, and MailerLite, alongside live chat support via LimeTalk. The site is mobile optimized and performs moderately well, though no explicit CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and no exposed sensitive data, but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies. Privacy compliance is partial, with terms of service present but no visible cookie consent mechanism or privacy policy page. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professional but could improve in privacy and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching anafra.eu

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
75
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ANAFRA holds a strong market position as the sole Supermicro system integrator in Czechia, offering a comprehensive portfolio of IT infrastructure services and hardware. Their business model combines service provision with hardware sales and system integration, targeting SMEs and larger enterprises needing reliable IT infrastructure. The company leverages partnerships with hardware vendors and remote support tools to enhance service delivery. Their marketing ecosystem includes newsletter campaigns and social media engagement, indicating active customer outreach. The absence of explicit privacy and security policies suggests room for maturity in compliance and governance. The company’s digital presence is consistent and professional, supporting growth and customer trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and no visible sensitive data leaks. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No incident response or security policy information is published, limiting transparency and preparedness perception. The lack of a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file indicates limited engagement with external security researchers. Privacy compliance is partial, with no cookie consent mechanism detected, which may expose the company to GDPR compliance risks. Overall, the security posture is functional but could benefit from enhanced policies, headers, and transparency to align with best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers including Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen site security.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Introduce a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to engage with security researchers.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize security risks and improve privacy.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ANAFRA a.s.
Description
We are taking responsibility for your IT since 2006. ANAFRA offers IT infrastructure services including virtual private servers, hosting, colocation, cloud storage (Nextcloud), IT management, data network administration, software and web development, and hardware sales with a focus on Supermicro systems.
Key services
Virtual private servers, Hosting, Colocation, ANAFRA MeetPoint, ANAFRA Nextcloud, IT management, Data network administration, Software and web development, SharePoint & Power BI, Server hardware
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, MailerLite, LimeTalk live chat, Leady tracking
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by URL)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and Clarity for analytics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, MailerLite tracking, Leady tracking
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Leady, MailerLite
Marketing tools
MailerLite, LimeTalk live chat
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is business-focused on IT infrastructure and hardware services.
  3. Multiple languages supported with language selector.
  4. Use of modern tracking and marketing tools.
  5. No explicit privacy or cookie policy found on main page but terms and conditions present.
  6. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  7. Social media presence is active and linked.
  8. No exposed sensitive data or obvious vulnerabilities in HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, and MailerLite for analytics and marketing automation. Live chat functionality is provided by LimeTalk. The site appears to be custom-built or uses a proprietary CMS, with no common CMS signatures detected. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and optimized images. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design and viewport meta tags. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured navigation. However, accessibility features are basic and could be improved. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical implementation supports business needs but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with anafra.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review anafra.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.