Skip to main content

Security report for an-gesbr.com

A&N GesbR · Other · Austria

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

42/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

A&N GesbR is a small partnership business based in Linz, Austria, represented by Philipp Asanger and Manuel Nobis. The website serves primarily as an informational portal with links to partner sites and basic company details including a physical address and VAT number. The business appears to operate in a retail or tools-related sector, though no explicit service descriptions are provided. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using Elementor and common web technologies such as jQuery and Bootstrap. However, the site lacks HTTPS, which is a critical security deficiency. No privacy or cookie policies are present, and no contact emails or phone numbers are provided, limiting user engagement and compliance with data protection regulations. The overall security posture is weak, with no advanced security headers or protections implemented. Performance data is missing, but the site likely suffers from slow loading due to lack of optimization. The domain registration data aligns well with the website content and business location, indicating legitimacy. Strategic improvements in security, privacy compliance, and contact transparency are recommended to enhance trust and professionalism.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching an-gesbr.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
42

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates as a small local partnership with a limited online presence. The website links to two partner domains, suggesting a collaborative business model possibly focused on retail or tools. The lack of detailed service descriptions and minimal content indicates a basic digital marketing approach. The business targets local customers or partners in Austria. There is no evidence of advanced revenue streams or e-commerce capabilities on the site. The partnership structure and VAT registration confirm a legitimate business entity. Growth potential may be limited without enhanced digital presence and compliance measures.

Security posture

The security posture is currently poor due to the absence of HTTPS and a valid SSL certificate, exposing visitors to data interception risks. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options are present. The site does not implement HSTS, OCSP stapling, or session resumption, which are standard best practices. DNSSEC and CAA records are missing, reducing DNS security. No privacy or security policies are published, and no incident response contacts are provided. These gaps indicate low security maturity and potential compliance issues with GDPR and related regulations. Immediate remediation of SSL and security headers is critical to reduce risk.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a valid SSL/TLS certificate and enforce HTTPS site-wide.
  2. Add and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR.
  3. Provide clear contact information including company emails and phone numbers.
  4. Configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Enable DNSSEC and CAA records to enhance DNS security.
  6. Develop and publish a security policy and incident response contact details.
  7. Optimize website performance and implement caching strategies.
  8. Improve content richness to better describe business services and value proposition.
  9. Consider adding analytics with privacy-compliant configurations to monitor user engagement.
  10. Regularly review and update website security and compliance posture.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
A&N GesbR
VAT number
ATU72326468
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted on Apache server with nameservers from world4you.at, indicating a regional hosting provider. It uses WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder, jQuery, Bootstrap, and FontAwesome for UI components. The site lacks HTTPS, which is a major technical and security flaw. No advanced security or performance optimizations are detected. The site uses chunked transfer encoding but no caching headers or performance metrics are available. Mobile optimization appears good based on responsive meta tags and CSS. SEO is basic with minimal meta tags and no structured data or Open Graph tags found. The technical stack is standard for small business websites but requires modernization and security hardening to meet current best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with an-gesbr.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review an-gesbr.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.