Skip to main content

Security report for amknepomuk.cz

Other · Czech Republic

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

46/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website for Automoto klub v AČR Nepomuk is a minimal, outdated online presence for a local automotive club in the Czech Republic with a claimed history since 1946. The site uses deprecated HTML framesets and lacks substantive content, modern design, or mobile optimization. There are no visible contact details, privacy policies, or terms of service, and no WHOIS data is available for the domain, which raises concerns about legitimacy and trustworthiness. The site includes Google Analytics and Tag Manager scripts but lacks security best practices such as HTTPS enforcement and security headers. Overall, the digital maturity of the site is low, and it does not meet modern standards for security or privacy compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching amknepomuk.cz

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
46

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The club appears to serve automotive enthusiasts locally, likely relying on membership and community events. The business model is typical for a small, regional club with limited online engagement. The absence of detailed business information, certifications, or contact data limits the ability to assess market positioning or growth potential. The website does not demonstrate competitive digital marketing or customer engagement strategies.

Security posture

The security posture is weak, with no HTTPS detected and no security headers present. The use of deprecated HTML framesets may expose the site to clickjacking or other UI-based attacks. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available. The site’s tracking via Google Analytics is present but without transparency or consent mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and enforce secure connections.
  2. Redesign the website using modern HTML5 and CSS standards, removing framesets.
  3. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance and consent mechanisms.
  4. Add contact information including emails and phone numbers to improve trust and communication.
  5. Introduce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options to enhance security.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Automoto klub v AČR Nepomuk appears to be an automotive club based in Nepomuk, Czech Republic, with a history dating back to 1946. The website likely serves members and visitors interested in automotive activities and club events.
Key services
Automotive club membership, Events and activities related to automobiles
Content quality
poor
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Performance
moderate
Mobile
poor
Accessibility
poor
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website uses deprecated frameset HTML structure, indicating outdated technology.
  2. No visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or social media links detected in the HTML content.
  4. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager scripts are present for tracking.
  5. No security headers or HTTPS enforcement detected in the provided data.
  6. WHOIS data is missing, which is a significant trust and legitimacy concern.
  7. Content is minimal and mostly navigational frames with no substantive content in the main HTML.
  8. No forms or data collection fields detected.
  9. No business registration or certification information found.
  10. No evidence of GDPR compliance or data protection officer information.
Technical notes

Notes

The website relies on outdated HTML framesets, which are deprecated and hinder accessibility and SEO. The presence of Google Analytics and Tag Manager indicates some level of tracking but lacks privacy compliance. No CMS or modern frameworks are detected. The site likely has slow performance on mobile devices due to lack of responsive design. Hosting provider and infrastructure details are not available. The technical debt is high, and modernization is recommended to improve usability, security, and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with amknepomuk.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review amknepomuk.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.