Skip to main content

Security report for amilina.com

ROQUETTE AMILINA · Manufacturing · Lithuania

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

47/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ROQUETTE AMILINA is a medium-sized manufacturing company operating in Lithuania as part of the larger ROQUETTE Group. The company specializes in deep processing of wheat to produce products for the food, paper, and feed industries, positioning itself as a key player in Northern Europe's manufacturing sector. The website reflects a professional digital presence built on WordPress, with adequate mobile optimization and basic SEO features. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though improvements such as enabling DNSSEC and adding security headers are recommended. The domain registration data aligns well with the business claims, supporting legitimacy. Overall, the website provides clear contact information and privacy compliance, but lacks explicit terms of service and security policy disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching amilina.com

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
47

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company leverages its parent ROQUETTE Group's brand and market position to serve industrial clients in multiple sectors including food and paper manufacturing. Its business model focuses on supplying processed wheat products, targeting B2B customers. The website's content and structure indicate a stable and consistent branding approach, with trust signals such as company registration details and social media presence. The absence of terms of service and incident response information suggests areas for maturity improvement. The partnership ecosystem is primarily internal with the parent company, with no external subsidiaries or partners explicitly listed.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a baseline security posture with HTTPS enabled and clientTransferProhibited domain status. Cookie consent is implemented with blocking scripts, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the lack of DNSSEC and missing security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represent gaps. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are published, which could impact readiness and transparency. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. Overall, security maturity is moderate but could benefit from enhanced technical controls and policy disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  3. Publish explicit security and incident response policies to improve transparency and preparedness.
  4. Add a terms of service page to clarify user agreements and legal protections.
  5. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and plugins to reduce vulnerability risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
ROQUETTE AMILINA
VAT number
LT470316610
Registration number
147031669
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ROQUETTE AMILINA
Description
ROQUETTE AMILINA is a company of the ROQUETTE Group, one of the largest manufacturing companies in Northern Europe, producing products from deep processing of wheat for food, paper, feed, and other industries.
Key services
Wheat deep processing, Product supply for food industry, Product supply for paper industry, Product supply for feed industry
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, FontAwesome, Linearicons, GDPR Cookie Consent plugin
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Client transfer prohibited domain status
  • Cookie consent with blocking scripts enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Content is primarily in Lithuanian with English alternate available
  3. Clear cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR
  4. No terms of service page found
  5. Contact information is clearly presented in footer
  6. No explicit security or incident response policies published
  7. Website uses WordPress CMS with common plugins
  8. No advanced analytics or advertising detected
  9. Domain registration is stable and consistent with business
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using common plugins such as GDPR Cookie Consent. It loads external resources like icon fonts and emoji scripts from trusted CDNs. Performance is moderate with some minified CSS and JS caching. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design elements. SEO is basic with meta viewport and canonical links but lacks advanced structured data or Open Graph tags. Accessibility features are minimal but present. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. The technical stack is modern but could be enhanced with additional security and SEO optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with amilina.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review amilina.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.