Skip to main content

Security report for ameda.lv

ameda.lv · E-commerce · Latvia

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ameda.lv is a Latvian-based e-commerce website specializing in premium compression products and cosmetics. The site targets a general audience interested in health and beauty products, positioning itself as a premium retailer with a focus on high customer service standards. The business model is retail e-commerce, leveraging WooCommerce on a WordPress platform with multilingual support for Latvian, English, and Russian languages. Technically, the website employs a modern technology stack including WordPress, WooCommerce, jQuery, Google Fonts, and various marketing and analytics tools such as Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Klaviyo, and ShareThis. The site is secured with HTTPS and implements a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR, indicating a mature approach to privacy compliance. However, some security best practices such as security headers and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not evident. From a security perspective, the website demonstrates good practices including HTTPS enforcement, use of reCAPTCHA, and cookie consent with granular controls. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of security.txt and privacy policy pages limits full compliance assessment. WHOIS data was unavailable due to query limits, restricting domain legitimacy verification. Overall, Ameda.lv presents as a legitimate, well-structured small e-commerce business with good technical and privacy compliance maturity. Strategic improvements in security headers, formal privacy and terms documentation, and incident response readiness would enhance its security posture and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ameda.lv

This scan found 22 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
100
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Ameda.lv operates in the niche market of compression products and cosmetics, targeting consumers in Latvia and potentially neighboring regions given multilingual support. The business leverages an online retail model via WooCommerce, focusing on premium product offerings and customer service excellence. The presence of advanced marketing tools like Klaviyo and retargeting via Google and Meta platforms suggests active customer engagement and growth strategies. The website's structured data and SEO optimizations indicate an intent to maintain strong online visibility. Lack of visible contact details and formal policies may impact customer trust and regulatory compliance. The business ecosystem includes partnerships with major ad and analytics providers but no direct partner or subsidiary domains were identified.

Security posture

The website's security posture is solid with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent implemented with detailed user controls, reflecting GDPR awareness. Use of reCAPTCHA helps mitigate bot traffic. However, the absence of key security headers (e.g., Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options) is a gap that could expose the site to certain web attacks. No evidence of malware, phishing, or data leaks was found. The lack of a security.txt file and incident response contact information reduces transparency and readiness for vulnerability reporting. Overall, the site is secure for typical e-commerce operations but would benefit from enhanced security controls and formalized incident response processes.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  2. Publish clear and accessible privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and customer trust.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve transparency.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ameda.lv
Description
Ameda.lv - Premium kompresijas produktu un kosmētikas interneta veikals ar augstāko klientu servisa novērtējumu.
Key services
Compression products, Cosmetics online sales
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, jQuery, Google Fonts, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Cookiebot, Chaport Live Chat, Select2, Owl Carousel, FontAwesome
Frameworks
WooCommerce, WPML (WordPress Multilingual Plugin)
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of reCAPTCHA for bot protection

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Klaviyo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Meta Platforms, Inc.
Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Klaviyo, ShareThis
Marketing tools
Klaviyo, ShareThis
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress WooCommerce e-commerce store selling compression products and cosmetics.
  2. Content is in Latvian with multilingual support (English, Russian).
  3. Cookie consent is implemented with detailed categories and third-party cookie disclosures.
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  5. No privacy policy or terms of service pages detected in the provided content.
  6. Use of multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools with GDPR consent.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  8. No visible security headers detected in the HTML content.
  9. Site uses HTTPS and modern fonts and scripts.
  10. No signs of adult or NSFW content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with WooCommerce, utilizing a variety of modern web technologies such as jQuery, Google Fonts, and several third-party marketing and analytics scripts. The site is multilingual, supporting Latvian, English, and Russian, powered by WPML. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and preconnect hints for fonts and APIs. Mobile optimization is good, and SEO is supported by Yoast SEO plugin with structured data in JSON-LD format. However, no explicit hosting provider information was found. The site uses multiple external domains for fonts, analytics, marketing, and chat services, which should be monitored for security and privacy compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ameda.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ameda.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.