Skip to main content

Security report for amazone.co.uk

AMAZONE Ltd. · Manufacturing · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AMAZONE Ltd. is a well-established manufacturer specializing in agricultural and municipal machinery, offering intelligent crop production systems and digital farming solutions. The company maintains a strong market position with a comprehensive product portfolio and international presence, supported by a professional website that reflects its manufacturing expertise and customer-centric services. The website is built on CoreMedia CMS and integrates modern technologies such as Google Tag Manager and a robust cookie consent mechanism, demonstrating digital maturity and compliance with privacy regulations. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement and no visible vulnerabilities, although some security headers could be explicitly confirmed. Overall, the site provides clear contact information, legal notices, and certifications, reinforcing trust and legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security header implementation, publishing incident response contacts, and adding a vulnerability disclosure policy to further strengthen security and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  3. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Unregistered MX Record

      MX record points to unregistered domain: mxb-002beb01.gslb.pphosted.com

      What to do: Remove or fix MX record pointing to unregistered domain

      • RFC 5321 §5.1
      • NIS2 21(2)(i)
      • IR 2024/2690 12.4: Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 12.4: Asset inventory
      • NIST CM-8: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-8: System Component Inventory
    • High

      No Name Servers Found

      Unable to find name servers for domain

      What to do: Configure proper name servers for the domain

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching amazone.co.uk

This scan found 22 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
37
Security headers
55
Email security
85
DNS health
40
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

AMAZONE Ltd. operates in the manufacturing sector, focusing on agricultural machinery and digital solutions for precision farming. The company targets professional farmers, contractors, and local authorities, offering high-performance machinery and digital services such as myAMAZONE. The business model centers on product sales, customer support, and digital service integration. The website indicates a medium-sized enterprise with a long operational history since 1998. The company leverages partnerships and maintains a broad dealer network, supported by multilingual sites and active social media channels. Certifications like the DLG Image Barometer enhance market credibility. The digital presence is professional and content-rich, supporting brand consistency and customer engagement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism that aligns with GDPR requirements. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The use of Google Tag Manager is consent-aware, and the site avoids common security pitfalls. However, explicit presence of security headers such as X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options was not confirmed in the provided data, representing an area for improvement. No incident response or security contact information was found, which could be enhanced to improve readiness and transparency. Overall, the security risk is low, but proactive measures could further mitigate potential threats.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify security headers like X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options explicitly.
  2. Publish an incident response policy and provide dedicated security contact channels.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve transparency.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking technologies for security compliance.
  5. Enhance documentation of data retention policies and privacy practices for user assurance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
AMAZONE Ltd.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
AMAZONE Ltd.
Description
Manufacturer of agricultural and municipal machinery, system provider for intelligent crop production.
Key services
Agricultural machinery manufacturing, Digital farming solutions, Customer support and service, Dealer and sales network
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
CoreMedia CMS, Google Tag Manager, Consentmanager.net cookie consent, JavaScript, HTML5, CSS3
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager with consent
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Consentmanager.net
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism implemented.
  3. Multiple language alternates and international presence indicated.
  4. Active social media presence on major platforms.
  5. No signs of blocking or WAF interference.
  6. Clear business and contact information provided.
  7. Use of modern CMS and tracking technologies with consent.
  8. No visible security vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by CoreMedia CMS, a professional content management system suitable for enterprise-level sites. It uses modern web standards including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript, with integration of Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. The cookie consent is managed by consentmanager.net, providing granular user control and GDPR compliance. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility considerations. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by rich media content and third-party scripts. Hosting details are limited but the domain is registered with a reputable registrar. Technical risks are minimal, with opportunities to improve security headers and incident response visibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with amazone.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review amazone.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.