Skip to main content

Security report for alterspruefung365.de

TOOLPIXX · Other · Germany

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website alterspruefung365.de is a simple, legally compliant Impressum page representing the business TOOLPIXX, operated by Andreas van Loock in Germany. The site provides essential contact information, including phone, email, physical address, and VAT number, but lacks commercial content or detailed business descriptions. The target audience appears to be general German-speaking users seeking legal or contact information about the business. Technically, the site is built with basic HTML and CSS, hosted on Schlundtech nameservers, and shows good mobile responsiveness and basic accessibility. No CMS or advanced frameworks are detected, and no external scripts or analytics tools are used, indicating a minimalistic digital footprint. Performance is moderate, with no obvious technical issues. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS (assumed from domain context, though SSL details not provided), but lacks security headers and privacy or cookie policies, which are important for GDPR compliance. No forms or input fields reduce attack surface, but the absence of security best practices like CSP or X-Frame-Options headers is noted. WHOIS data is consistent and transparent, supporting legitimacy. Overall, the website is low risk but could improve compliance and security posture by adding privacy and cookie policies, security headers, and possibly a vulnerability disclosure policy. The site’s minimalistic nature limits exposure but also reduces trust signals for users seeking more comprehensive business information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching alterspruefung365.de

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
25
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention alterspruefung365.de, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for alterspruefung365.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

TOOLPIXX appears to be a small German business with a clear legal presence as indicated by the Impressum and VAT number. The lack of detailed service descriptions or marketing content suggests a niche or support role rather than a direct consumer-facing commercial site. The business model and revenue streams are not disclosed. The company maintains transparency through clear contact details and legal disclosures, which is a competitive advantage in the German market where Impressum compliance is mandatory. No partnerships or subsidiaries are indicated. Growth indicators and strategic positioning cannot be assessed due to limited content.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS usage and no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. However, the absence of security headers and privacy/cookie policies indicates gaps in security best practices and GDPR compliance. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, limiting readiness for security events. The minimal use of external scripts and lack of forms reduce attack vectors. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, suitable for a simple informational site but requiring improvements for enhanced trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve security posture.
  3. Introduce a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to enhance transparency and incident response readiness.
  4. Ensure HTTPS is enforced site-wide and verify SSL configuration for best practices.
  5. Consider expanding business content to improve user trust and provide clearer business model insights.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
TOOLPIXX
VAT number
DE217345852
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
TOOLPIXX
Description
The website represents a business operated by Andreas van Loock under the name TOOLPIXX, located in Rieden, Germany. The content is focused on legal disclosure (Impressum) information rather than commercial or service descriptions.
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • No forms detected, reducing input attack surface
  • No external scripts detected

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a simple Impressum page with legal and contact information.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap for GDPR.
  3. No forms or interactive elements detected, reducing attack surface.
  4. No external scripts or analytics detected, indicating minimal tracking.
  5. WHOIS data is consistent and transparent, supporting trustworthiness.
  6. No security headers detected; security posture can be improved.
  7. No advertising or marketing tools detected.
  8. Content is in German and targeted at German users.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with clean, valid HTML5 and CSS3, with no detected JavaScript or external libraries. Hosting is provided by Schlundtech, a known German hosting provider. The site is mobile responsive and accessible at a basic level but lacks advanced SEO optimizations such as meta description tags or structured data. No CMS or frameworks are detected, indicating a static or simple site architecture. Performance is moderate with no blocking resources. Technical debt is minimal due to simplicity, but modernization opportunities include adding structured data and improving SEO and accessibility features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with alterspruefung365.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review alterspruefung365.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.