Skip to main content

Security report for altersfragen.li

Liechtensteiner Seniorenbund · Government · Liechtenstein

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.senioren-info.li is a comprehensive digital handbook dedicated to senior citizens in Liechtenstein, providing detailed information on living arrangements, care, legal matters, finances, and health-related topics. It serves as an authoritative resource supported by recognized local organizations such as the Liechtensteiner Seniorenbund and government-related entities. The content is well-structured, detailed, and tailored to the needs of seniors and their families, positioning the site as a key informational portal in the region. Technically, the site is built on the concrete5 CMS platform, utilizing modern frontend technologies including jQuery, Alpine.js, and Font Awesome. It employs Matomo analytics for user tracking, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The site is mobile-optimized and presents good SEO practices, although accessibility features are basic. Performance is moderate, with no significant technical issues detected. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses obfuscated email links to reduce spam. However, it lacks visible security headers and does not provide a security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy. Privacy and cookie policies are not explicitly found, and no consent mechanisms are present, which may impact compliance with GDPR and related regulations. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional, with strong business credibility and excellent content quality. The absence of explicit privacy and cookie policies, as well as some security best practices, suggests areas for improvement to enhance compliance and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching altersfragen.li

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
60
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website targets senior citizens and their families in Liechtenstein, offering a non-profit informational service that covers a broad spectrum of senior-related topics including housing, care, legal advice, and financial support. It leverages partnerships with local organizations and government bodies, enhancing its credibility and reach. The business model focuses on providing free, accessible information rather than commercial services. The site occupies a strong market position as a trusted local resource, with detailed contact information and references to official institutions. Growth potential lies in expanding digital services and improving compliance and security features.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and email addresses are obfuscated to mitigate spam risks. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces its defense-in-depth. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, which limits transparency and preparedness. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies and lack of consent mechanisms. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. Enhancing security headers, publishing a security.txt, and implementing privacy compliance measures would significantly improve the security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to strengthen security.
  3. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve incident response transparency.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users, including those with disabilities.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Liechtensteiner Seniorenbund
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Liechtensteiner Seniorenbund
Description
Informationsportal für Seniorinnen und Senioren in Liechtenstein providing answers to common questions about living, care, finances, and legal matters related to aging.
Key services
Information on senior living options, Care and nursing guidance, Legal and financial advice, Contact details for relevant organizations and services
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Font Awesome, Alpine.js (x-data, x-show directives), Matomo Analytics
Frameworks
concrete5 CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of obfuscated email links to reduce spam

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a comprehensive resource for senior citizens in Liechtenstein.
  2. Content is well-structured with detailed Q&A style information.
  3. No privacy or cookie policies explicitly found on the analyzed page.
  4. Uses Matomo analytics for user tracking without visible cookie consent mechanism.
  5. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy.
  6. Contact information is abundant and clearly presented.
  7. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
  8. Website uses concrete5 CMS and modern frontend technologies.
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the concrete5 CMS platform, utilizing jQuery, Alpine.js, and Font Awesome for frontend interactivity and styling. It integrates Matomo analytics for user tracking. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design elements and good SEO metadata including Open Graph tags. Performance is moderate with no critical technical debt observed. However, the site lacks advanced accessibility features and security headers. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure is stable but could benefit from modernization in security and accessibility aspects.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with altersfragen.li. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review altersfragen.li.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.