Skip to main content

Security report for altech.cz

ALTECH, spol. s r.o. · Manufacturing · Czech Republic

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ALTECH, spol. s r.o. is a Czech company specializing in manufacturing and providing tailored barrier-free accessibility solutions such as stair lifts, vertical and inclined platforms, and lifting systems for immobile persons. Established in 1992, the company holds a strong market position in the Czech Republic and exports globally. Their website reflects a mature digital presence with comprehensive product information, customer testimonials, and clear contact channels. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern frameworks and includes robust SEO and mobile optimization. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, security headers, and privacy compliance, although no explicit security policy or incident response information is published. WHOIS data is missing, which slightly impacts domain trust but does not detract from the professional business presentation. Overall, ALTECH demonstrates a credible and trustworthy online presence aligned with its business operations.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching altech.cz

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
73
Average
50
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ALTECH operates in the manufacturing sector focused on accessibility products for persons with limited mobility. Their business model includes custom manufacturing, consulting, and after-sales service. The company targets individuals, families, institutions, and public facilities requiring barrier-free solutions. Their partnerships with European manufacturers and suppliers enhance their product offerings. The website content and references indicate a well-established brand with a medium-sized operation. Marketing efforts include active social media engagement and participation in community support initiatives. The company shows growth potential through innovation and customer-centric services.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with strong SSL configuration and security headers, indicating good baseline security practices. Use of reCAPTCHA on forms and cookie consent mechanisms demonstrate attention to privacy and bot mitigation. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a public security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure reduces transparency. The site would benefit from publishing these documents to enhance trust and compliance. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be improved with formal documentation and incident readiness disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Add incident response contact information or abuse reporting channels on the website.
  3. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure policy to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Consider appointing and publishing Data Protection Officer contact details if applicable under GDPR.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
ALTECH, spol. s r.o.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ALTECH, spol. s r.o.
Description
Jsme společnost ALTECH, pomáháme lidem překonávat bariéry již od roku 1992. Jsme hrdými výrobci plošin pro vozíčkáře.
Key services
šikmé schodišťové plošiny, schodišťové sedačky, svislé zdvihací plošiny / domácí výtahy, zvedací systémy pro imobilní osoby, bazénové zvedací systémy, nájezdové rampy a ližiny, plošiny pro letadlové schody, schodolezy
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Bootstrap, Slick Carousel, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Bing Ads, CookieHub, reCAPTCHA
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of reCAPTCHA on forms
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Microsoft Clarity, Google Analytics (via GTM)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Bing Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
AddToAny
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well maintained.
  2. Content is comprehensive and focused on accessibility products.
  3. Multiple customer testimonials and references increase trust.
  4. Strong presence of privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  5. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual and reduces domain trust slightly.
  6. No signs of security blocking or WAF interference.
  7. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  8. Contact information is clearly presented and includes multiple channels.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including PHP, jQuery, Bootstrap, and Slick Carousel for UI components. It uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing tags, Microsoft Clarity for user behavior analytics, and Facebook Pixel for advertising. The site is optimized for performance with lazy loading and caching plugins (WP Rocket). Mobile responsiveness and accessibility are well implemented. SEO is enhanced by Yoast SEO plugin with structured data (JSON-LD) and Open Graph tags. No hosting provider details were found. The technical infrastructure supports a fast, secure, and user-friendly experience with minimal technical debt.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with altech.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review altech.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.