Skip to main content

Security report for alskadestad.se

Other · Sweden

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website AlskadeStad.se presents a minimalistic digital presence with a focus on cookie consent and privacy compliance. The site uses modern technologies including Episerver CMS, Microsoft Azure hosting, and multiple analytics tools such as Microsoft Application Insights, Piwik Pro, and New Relic. However, the lack of substantive content, absence of contact information, and missing WHOIS registration data for the domain reduce the overall credibility and business transparency. The cookie consent mechanism is comprehensive and GDPR compliant, indicating a good privacy posture. Security-wise, HTTPS is enforced and monitoring tools are in place, but security headers and explicit security policies are missing. The domain's WHOIS data is unavailable, suggesting it may be a subdomain or alias, which impacts trustworthiness. Overall, the site is functional but lacks business and security transparency, limiting its trust and professional appeal.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching alskadestad.se

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
25
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website appears to be associated with or related to the Ragnsells group of companies, as evidenced by multiple cookies and references to ragnsells.com and its regional domains. This suggests a partnership or service relationship, possibly as a campaign or informational site. The business model and target audience are unclear due to minimal content. The site is likely small in scale and focused on providing information or services related to the partner companies. The presence of multiple analytics and monitoring tools indicates an interest in user behavior and performance metrics, but the lack of direct business information or contact details limits competitive and market positioning insights.

Security posture

The site enforces HTTPS and uses advanced monitoring tools, which are positive security indicators. The comprehensive cookie consent banner demonstrates GDPR compliance and user privacy respect. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options is a gap. No visible security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present, which reduces the site's security maturity. The missing WHOIS data and domain registration information raise concerns about domain legitimacy and ownership transparency. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved with better security headers, explicit policies, and contact information.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish explicit security headers to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Provide clear business contact information and security policies to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
  5. Improve SEO metadata and content richness to increase site visibility and user engagement.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Microsoft Application Insights, Episerver (Optimizely), Piwik Pro, Microsoft Azure, New Relic
Frameworks
Episerver CMS
Platforms
Microsoft Azure
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • Use of Application Insights for monitoring

Analytics and tracking

Services
Microsoft Application Insights, Piwik Pro, New Relic, Episerver Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Application Insights, Piwik Pro, New Relic
Marketing tools
Episerver Analytics
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website uses a comprehensive cookie consent banner with detailed cookie descriptions
  2. No WHOIS data available for the domain, indicating possible subdomain or alias usage
  3. No visible contact information or business details on the homepage
  4. Uses multiple third-party analytics and monitoring tools
  5. No terms of service or security policy pages detected
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found
  7. Website content is minimal with no descriptive metadata content
  8. No forms detected on the homepage
  9. No social media links or company emails found
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript-based front end with module scripts and CSS variables for styling. It leverages Episerver CMS and is hosted on Microsoft Azure infrastructure. Multiple third-party analytics and monitoring services are integrated, including Microsoft Application Insights, Piwik Pro, and New Relic, indicating a mature approach to performance and user behavior tracking. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and includes a detailed cookie consent overlay. However, the site lacks visible forms, business content, and structured data such as JSON-LD for enhanced SEO. Performance appears moderate with asynchronous script loading but could benefit from further optimization and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with alskadestad.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review alskadestad.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.