Skip to main content

Security report for alsenta.com

ALSENTA s.r.o. · Other · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Alsenta.com operates as a B2B marketplace platform focused on supplier discovery and procurement auctions, primarily targeting businesses seeking efficient supplier selection processes. The website content is in Czech with some multilingual options, offering integration with reverse auction systems to enhance procurement efficiency. Technically, the site uses basic JavaScript libraries such as Prototype.js and AJAX but lacks modern CMS or frameworks. The site shows moderate performance but poor mobile optimization and minimal SEO or accessibility features. Security posture is weak due to lack of HTTPS enforcement, missing security headers, and insecure form handling. No privacy or cookie policies are present, and no contact or social media information is provided, limiting transparency. The WHOIS data is missing, raising concerns about domain legitimacy. Overall, the site presents basic business functionality but requires significant improvements in security, privacy compliance, and technical modernization.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching alsenta.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
20
Email security
75
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention alsenta.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
2
Employees
0
Customers
2
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
100%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for alsenta.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Alsenta s.r.o. appears to be a small Czech company operating a niche B2B marketplace and procurement auction platform. The business model centers on connecting buyers with suppliers through selection procedures and reverse auctions. The website links to related domains indicating a partnership ecosystem. However, the lack of detailed company information, contact data, and certifications limits trust signals. The absence of WHOIS registration data for the domain is a critical concern. The company targets B2B clients in procurement sectors but needs to enhance transparency and digital maturity to strengthen market position and credibility.

Security posture

The website's security posture is currently weak. The absence of HTTPS and security headers exposes users to risks such as data interception and clickjacking. The login form lacks a defined action URL, potentially risking credential exposure. No privacy or cookie policies are implemented, indicating poor compliance with GDPR and related regulations. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available. The missing WHOIS data further undermines trust. Immediate remediation is required to secure communications, protect user data, and comply with privacy laws.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure all communications.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users.
  3. Secure the login form with proper action URLs, CSRF protection, and input validation.
  4. Publish contact information and security incident response details to improve transparency.
  5. Enhance mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO to improve user experience and reach.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ALSENTA s.r.o.
Description
Alsenta.com is a B2B system enabling efficient search for new contacts and potential suppliers. It allows users to create selection procedures to contact hundreds of suitable suppliers quickly. The system includes online updated databases from several countries and integrates with reverse auction systems for procurement auctions. It aims to increase efficiency and effectiveness in supplier selection and procurement processes.
Key services
Supplier contact search, Selection procedure creation, Integration with reverse auction system, Online updated supplier databases
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Prototype.js, AJAX
Performance
moderate
Mobile
poor
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
30/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of password fields in login form

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with full content and no WAF blocking
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  3. Login form present but lacks secure form action
  4. No contact emails, phone numbers, or social media links found
  5. Minimal SEO and accessibility features
  6. WHOIS data missing, indicating possible domain registration issues
  7. Website content is in Czech with some multilingual support
  8. External links to related domains alsenta.cz and nakupniaukce.cz
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses legacy JavaScript libraries such as Prototype.js and AJAX for client-side functionality. No modern frameworks or CMS platforms are detected. The HTML structure is basic with minimal meta tags and no Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data. Performance is moderate but mobile responsiveness is poor. There is no evidence of hosting provider or CDN usage. The site lacks security headers and HTTPS enforcement, indicating technical debt and security risks. Modernization opportunities include adopting responsive design, improving SEO metadata, implementing security best practices, and upgrading the technology stack to current standards.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with alsenta.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review alsenta.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.