Skip to main content

Security report for alpolic.eu

Mitsubishi Polyester Film GmbH · Manufacturing · Germany

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.alpolic.eu represents Mitsubishi Polyester Film GmbH, a well-established manufacturer specializing in aluminum composite panels with over 50 years of industry experience. The company targets a broad audience including construction and facade professionals, offering high-quality products with a focus on performance, corrosion protection, and design. The website is professionally designed with consistent branding and clear navigation, supporting multiple languages including German, English, and French. Technical infrastructure includes modern analytics tools such as Google Analytics and Matomo, integrated via Google Tag Manager, and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism ensuring GDPR compliance. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, though additional security headers and explicit incident response policies are recommended for improvement. The absence of publicly available WHOIS data due to privacy protection slightly reduces transparency but is common for corporate domains. Overall, the website demonstrates a mature digital presence with good privacy and security practices, supporting the company's credibility and market position.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching alpolic.eu

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention alpolic.eu, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for alpolic.eu right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Mitsubishi Polyester Film GmbH operates in the manufacturing sector, focusing on aluminum composite panels for facade applications. The business model centers on product development, manufacturing, and distribution to construction and architectural markets. The company leverages its long-standing market presence and product performance as competitive advantages. The website's multilingual support and detailed product information indicate a global or European market focus. Analytics usage and cookie consent reflect a commitment to data privacy and user experience. No direct contact information or terms of service were found, which could be areas for enhancement. The company appears to maintain a professional online ecosystem with trusted third-party integrations but lacks visible certifications or security policies on the site.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses a cookie consent banner with granular user controls, indicating good privacy compliance. Security headers are partially implemented, but key headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are missing, which could improve protection against common web attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of published security policies or incident response contacts limits transparency and readiness perception. The use of third-party analytics and marketing tools is disclosed with privacy links, supporting GDPR compliance. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by adding explicit security documentation, improving header configurations, and providing incident response contact details.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to enhance web security.
  2. Publish explicit security and incident response policies on the website to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Add clear contact information for security incidents such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet recognized standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and analytics tools to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Mitsubishi Polyester Film GmbH
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Mitsubishi Polyester Film GmbH
Description
ALPOLIC™ steht seit mehr als 50 Jahren für die Entwicklung und Herstellung hochwertiger Verbundplatten für die anspruchsvolle Fassadenverkleidungen.
Key services
Development and manufacturing of aluminum composite panels, Product performance and corrosion protection, Installation and delivery services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, jQuery (implied by Cookiebot usage), Bootstrap CSS (implied by classes)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google
Tracking pixels
Cookiebot tracking pixel
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Cookie consent is implemented with detailed categories and user control
  3. WHOIS data is not publicly available, indicating privacy protection
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content provided
  5. Use of Google Analytics and Matomo for analytics with privacy disclosures
  6. No terms of service page detected
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies published
  8. Website is multilingual with German as primary language
  9. Good SEO and meta tag usage including Open Graph and Twitter cards
  10. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot for analytics and cookie management. The HTML structure is valid and SEO optimized with appropriate meta tags, Open Graph, and Twitter cards. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design elements and preloaded fonts for performance. Hosting details and CMS are not explicitly identified. Performance is moderate with room for improvement in loading speed and accessibility. The site lacks visible CMS footprints, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Overall, the technical implementation supports a professional and user-friendly experience but could benefit from enhanced performance tuning and accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with alpolic.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review alpolic.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.