Skip to main content

Security report for alpla.com

ALPLA Werke Alwin Lehner GmbH · Manufacturing · Austria

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ALPLA Werke Alwin Lehner GmbH is a global leader in the manufacturing and development of innovative plastic packaging solutions, serving a wide range of industries with products such as bottles, caps, and injection-moulded parts. The company emphasizes sustainability and circular economy principles, leveraging over 30 years of recycling expertise. The website reflects a mature enterprise with a strong market position and comprehensive digital presence. Technically, the site is built on Drupal 10, employs modern analytics and marketing tools, and is optimized for mobile and accessibility. Security posture is good with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not published. WHOIS data is unavailable, which slightly reduces trust but is offset by strong branding and compliance disclosures. Overall, ALPLA presents a professional, trustworthy, and well-structured digital footprint aligned with its business stature.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching alpla.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
50
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ALPLA operates in the manufacturing sector, focusing on plastic packaging solutions with a global footprint spanning 46 countries and 200 locations. Its business model centers on innovation, sustainability, and customer-centric packaging solutions. The company targets industrial clients requiring advanced packaging systems and emphasizes environmental responsibility. The presence of multiple subdomains for sustainability, careers, and product catalogues indicates a diversified digital strategy supporting various business functions. Partnerships such as the supplier portal indicate a robust ecosystem. The company’s disclosures on modern slavery, tax strategy, and gender pay reporting reflect compliance and corporate governance maturity.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and integrates cookie consent mechanisms, demonstrating adherence to privacy regulations. Use of reputable analytics and marketing tools is evident, with asynchronous script loading to optimize performance. However, the absence of explicit security headers and published incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies suggests room for improvement. No direct contact emails or phone numbers for security or abuse reporting were found, which could hinder incident handling. The WHOIS data is missing, possibly due to privacy protection, which slightly impacts trustworthiness. Overall, the security posture is solid but could benefit from enhanced transparency and formal security documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and readiness.
  2. Add security-related HTTP headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), Strict-Transport-Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Provide explicit security contact channels (e.g., security@alpla.com) for vulnerability reporting and incident communication.
  4. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Review WHOIS registration details to ensure transparency and alignment with corporate identity.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
ALPLA Werke Alwin Lehner GmbH & Co KG
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ALPLA Werke Alwin Lehner GmbH
Description
ALPLA is a global leader in the development and production of innovative plastic packaging solutions, producing packaging systems, bottles, caps, and injection-moulded parts for various industries. The company emphasizes sustainability and climate-friendly resource use, with over 30 years of recycling experience and own recycling plants.
Key services
Plastic packaging development, Production of bottles, caps, injection-moulded parts, Recycling and sustainable packaging solutions
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal 10, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Dynamics Marketing Forms, Mapbox GL JS, CookieHub, Microsoft Clarity
Frameworks
Drupal
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security and analytics scripts asynchronously

Analytics and tracking

Services
Microsoft Clarity, Fathom Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Fathom Analytics
Marketing tools
Microsoft Dynamics Marketing Forms
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia
  2. Strong emphasis on sustainability and corporate responsibility
  3. Multiple language support with hreflang tags
  4. Use of modern web technologies and analytics
  5. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms
  6. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage; contact via forms and regional contacts pages
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies published
  8. WHOIS data unavailable, possibly due to privacy protection or domain registration under different name
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal 10, a modern and widely supported CMS, ensuring a robust content management framework. It uses Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, and Fathom Analytics for tracking and user behavior analysis, indicating a mature analytics setup. The presence of Microsoft Dynamics Marketing Forms shows integration with enterprise marketing automation. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive images and accessibility features such as skip links. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts and optimized media. No major technical debt or outdated libraries were detected. Opportunities exist to enhance security headers and improve incident response infrastructure.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 51/100Medium25 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with alpla.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review alpla.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.