Skip to main content

Security report for alljbtop.com

Other · N/a

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website 'All Jay Bee TopList' operates as an illicit content aggregator focusing on illegal and highly explicit material involving minors, including jailbait and hacked surveillance content. It functions primarily as a toplist linking to numerous suspicious and illegal external domains. The site lacks any legitimate business information, privacy policies, or contact details, and its domain is very recently registered, indicating a high risk of malicious intent. Technically, the site is minimalistic with poor design, no modern frameworks, and no security best practices implemented. There is no HTTPS enforcement or security headers detected. The advertising is served via an external ad network, but no reputable analytics or tracking services are identified. Overall, the site poses significant legal, ethical, and security risks and should be considered highly untrustworthy.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching alljbtop.com

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
50
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business model appears to be affiliate or advertising-based, monetizing traffic to illegal and illicit content sites. The target audience is adults seeking illegal child exploitation content. The site has no visible partnerships or legitimate market positioning and operates in a highly illegal niche. The domain's recent registration and lack of transparency further indicate a high-risk operation with no credible business foundation.

Security posture

The security posture is extremely weak. There is no HTTPS detected, no security headers, no privacy or cookie policies, and no incident response or contact information. The site exposes visitors to potential legal and security risks. The presence of JavaScript making XMLHttpRequests without clear privacy safeguards indicates moderate user tracking without compliance. The site is vulnerable to multiple security and compliance issues and lacks any form of responsible security management.

Recommendations

  1. Immediate removal of illegal content and cessation of operations to comply with legal standards.
  2. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure user connections.
  3. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  4. Establish clear contact and incident response channels for security and abuse reporting.
  5. Implement security headers and best practices to protect users and infrastructure.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
List of top JailBait sites. Updates daily with fresh JB links. No annoying ads!
Key services
Toplist of JailBait and illegal content sites
Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, HTML
Performance
moderate
Mobile
poor
Accessibility
poor
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
10/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
alljbads.live
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website hosts and promotes illegal and highly explicit content involving minors.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact or business information provided.
  4. Technical implementation is minimal and outdated.
  5. No security best practices observed.
  6. Domain is very new and suspicious.
  7. Advertising is present via an external ad network.
  8. No analytics or tracking services clearly identified except custom JS calls.
  9. Content is highly illegal and poses significant legal and ethical risks.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses basic HTML and JavaScript with no modern frameworks or CMS detected. The domain is registered with Tucows Domains Inc. but lacks hosting provider details. Performance is moderate but mobile optimization and accessibility are poor. SEO is minimal with no meta tags beyond description and title. The site uses iframes for advertising from an external ad network. There is no evidence of analytics services like Google Analytics. The technical debt is high, and modernization is needed if the site were to be repurposed for legitimate use.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with alljbtop.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review alljbtop.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.