Skip to main content

Security report for allive.com

Allive · Manufacturing · Lithuania

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Allive is a vertically integrated hemp cultivation and manufacturing company with a strong market presence in Europe and North America. The company specializes in premium hemp products, organic superfoods, and sustainable hemp-based ingredients, serving retailers and health-conscious consumers. Their operations are supported by multiple certifications and a commitment to quality and sustainability. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using modern plugins and SEO tools, with moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and no exposed sensitive data, but lacks advanced security headers and published security policies. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the website reflects a credible and professional business but should improve compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching allive.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
20
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Allive holds a leading position in the hemp manufacturing sector, leveraging vertically integrated operations and multiple processing facilities. Founded in 2013, the company has expanded across Europe, Canada, and the USA, launching brands like Planet Superfood and offering private label services. Their business model focuses on quality, sustainability, and innovation, supported by certifications and partnerships with major retailers such as Costco. Growth indicators include expanding product lines and increasing processing capacity. The company targets health-conscious consumers and retailers seeking certified organic hemp products.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, ensuring encrypted communications. However, it lacks DNSSEC and common security headers, which could improve protection against DNS spoofing and clickjacking. No security or incident response policies are published, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present. The use of Google Analytics and Ahrefs tracking is transparent with opt-out options, but privacy policies are missing, indicating compliance gaps. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could benefit from enhanced security controls and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Implement a cookie consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to strengthen DNS security.
  5. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve trust and transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Allive
Description
Allive is a global leader in premium hemp cultivation and manufacturing, specializing in hemp farming, processing, and delivering high-quality hemp-based ingredients, organic superfoods, and sustainable hemp products. The company operates in Europe, Canada, and the USA with vertically integrated operations and a focus on sustainability and social responsibility.
Key services
Hemp cultivation, Hemp ingredient manufacturing, Organic superfood products, Private label manufacturing, Brand development
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, Google Analytics (MonsterInsights), jQuery, WPBakery Page Builder, Elementor, Slider Revolution, Kubio Blocks
Frameworks
WordPress CMS
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data detected
  • Google Analytics opt-out mechanism present

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Ahrefs Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Ahrefs Analytics
Marketing tools
MonsterInsights Google Analytics plugin
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich.
  2. No privacy or cookie policy pages found, indicating compliance gaps.
  3. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on the homepage or navigation.
  4. Strong emphasis on quality certifications and product information.
  5. Uses multiple WordPress plugins and builders, indicating a modern CMS setup.
  6. Google Analytics and Ahrefs tracking scripts present, with opt-out mechanisms.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  8. No visible social media links detected in the provided content.
  9. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and consistent business presence.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with popular plugins including Yoast SEO, MonsterInsights for Google Analytics, WPBakery Page Builder, Elementor, and Slider Revolution. The tech stack is modern and supports SEO and user experience well. Performance is moderate with caching and minified CSS in use. Mobile optimization is good, but accessibility features are basic. The site uses multiple external resources such as Google Fonts and analytics scripts. No major technical debt or vulnerabilities are evident from the HTML content. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with allive.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review allive.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.