Skip to main content

Security report for allianceplast.com

Alliance Plast · Manufacturing · Latvia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Alliance Plast is a leading Latvian manufacturer specializing in food-grade polypropylene plastic packaging, serving the Baltic, Scandinavian, and broader European markets. With over 20 years of market presence and a large workforce, the company offers a wide range of standard and custom packaging solutions compliant with high food safety standards such as FSSA. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear navigation and relevant content targeting dealers and industry professionals. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins and frameworks, providing a good user experience and mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and GDPR-compliant cookie consent, though explicit security policies and incident response information are absent. The absence of WHOIS registration data raises some concerns about domain legitimacy, warranting further verification. Overall, the website is trustworthy and well-maintained, supporting the company's market position.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching allianceplast.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
80
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Alliance Plast operates in the manufacturing sector, focusing on plastic packaging for food and other industries. The company leverages its extensive product range and certifications to maintain a competitive advantage in European markets. Its business model centers on wholesale trade and custom manufacturing, supported by a sizable specialist team and logistics fleet. The company actively engages in marketing and events, as evidenced by recent news posts. Social media presence on Facebook, LinkedIn, and Instagram supports brand visibility. The website's content and structure indicate a mature business with a focus on quality and compliance, though the lack of transparent domain registration data is a notable anomaly.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and includes a secure login form, indicating basic security hygiene. Cookie consent mechanisms demonstrate GDPR awareness. However, the absence of security headers and published security or incident response policies suggests room for improvement in security maturity. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The lack of a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy limits transparency for security researchers. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced with additional policies and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to improve trust and legitimacy perception.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Alliance Plast
Description
Alliance Plast is a stable, fast growing and the largest Latvian company producing plastic packaging for food and other industries, operating in Baltic, Scandinavian, Western and Eastern European markets. They manufacture food-grade polypropylene packaging including standard stock boats, rectangular and round products, and specialty custom manufactured packaging compliant with high food safety standards.
Key services
Plastic packaging manufacturing, Custom polypropylene packaging, Food-grade packaging solutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 5.8.10, PHP, jQuery, Elementor, Smart Slider 3, Google Analytics, Font Awesome, Verge3D, VRM360
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure login form with POST method
  • Cookie consent banner with GDPR compliance

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Smart Slider 3, Elementor
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation
  2. No WAF or blocking detected
  3. Professional manufacturing business with clear market positioning
  4. WHOIS data missing, which reduces trustworthiness score
  5. Good GDPR and cookie compliance with consent mechanism
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response information published
  7. Use of modern WordPress plugins and technologies
  8. Presence of social media links to Facebook, LinkedIn, Instagram
  9. Contact info clearly provided including email, phone, physical address
  10. Login form present for user authentication
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 5.8.10 using Elementor and Smart Slider 3 plugins, indicating a modern CMS-based infrastructure. It uses jQuery and Font Awesome for UI components and Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate, with some optimization opportunities. Accessibility features are basic but present. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. The site uses multiple JavaScript libraries for 3D modeling and product visualization, suggesting advanced technical capabilities in product presentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with allianceplast.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review allianceplast.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.