Skip to main content

Security report for alisone.lv

Other · N/a

Partial score · DNS & email only

53/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website alisone.lv currently serves a security CAPTCHA challenge page powered by BitNinja, indicating that visitors' IP addresses are blocked for security reasons and require CAPTCHA validation to proceed. This suggests the site is protected against automated bots and potential cyber threats but also indicates possible prior abuse or attacks. The page content is minimal and focused solely on security validation, with no visible business or contact information. The technical infrastructure includes outdated CMS versions (Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5) and uses Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking. The security posture shows strengths in bot mitigation via CAPTCHA but weaknesses due to outdated software and lack of visible security headers or privacy policies. Overall, the site is currently inaccessible for normal browsing without passing the security challenge, limiting content and business insights.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching alisone.lv

This scan found 13 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
53

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention alisone.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for alisone.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the security challenge page and lack of business content, detailed business intelligence is limited. The site appears to be protected by BitNinja security services, possibly indicating a focus on cybersecurity or hosting protection. No company name, contact details, or business model information is available. The presence of multiple CMS metadata tags suggests legacy or multi-platform usage. The target audience is general internet users attempting to access the site. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified from the content.

Security posture

The security posture is moderate with the presence of a BitNinja CAPTCHA challenge effectively blocking automated and potentially malicious traffic. However, the use of outdated CMS versions (Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5) introduces significant vulnerabilities. No security headers are detected, and HTTPS enforcement cannot be confirmed from the content. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, indicating compliance gaps. The site uses Google reCAPTCHA v2, which is a standard bot mitigation tool. Overall, while the site employs some security best practices, critical improvements are needed to address legacy software risks and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Upgrade all CMS platforms to supported, secure versions to eliminate known vulnerabilities.
  2. Implement and verify comprehensive security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Ensure HTTPS is properly configured and enforced site-wide.
  4. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and user trust.
  5. Provide visible and verified contact information to enhance business credibility and support.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

BitNinja detected. Page is a security CAPTCHA challenge by BitNinja indicating IP blocking and requiring CAPTCHA validation to proceed. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Description
The page is a security CAPTCHA validation page indicating the visitor's IP is blocked for security reasons and requires CAPTCHA completion to be delisted.
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Joomla 1.5, WordPress 2.5, Drupal, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA v2
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v2 for bot mitigation
  • Security check by BitNinja.IO

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website content is blocked behind a BitNinja CAPTCHA security challenge
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit exceeded
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  4. No contact information or business details provided
  5. Outdated CMS versions indicated in metadata
  6. Use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking
  7. No visible security headers or HTTPS enforcement details
  8. Page is minimal and focused solely on CAPTCHA validation
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses legacy CMS platforms Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5, which are outdated and pose security risks. The site integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for user tracking and Google reCAPTCHA v2 for bot mitigation. The HTML content is minimal and primarily serves the CAPTCHA challenge. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility. SEO optimization is poor due to lack of meta tags beyond basic keywords and description. The hosting provider is not identified. The site lacks modern frameworks or platforms and shows signs of technical debt and potential security risks from legacy software.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with alisone.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review alisone.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.