Skip to main content

Security report for alisej.com

ALISE J DESIGN STUDIO · Other · Latvia

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ALISE J DESIGN STUDIO is a small local design business based in Rīga, Latvia, as indicated by the structured data on the website. The website is built on the Wix platform, utilizing Wix's standard scripts and hosting services. The digital infrastructure is basic but functional, with moderate performance and good mobile optimization. However, the lack of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy and ownership verification. The website lacks critical privacy and cookie policies, security headers, and contact information beyond a physical address, which impacts trust and compliance. Security posture is minimal with no advanced protections detected, and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. Overall, the website serves as a basic online presence for the business but requires significant improvements in security, compliance, and business credibility to enhance trustworthiness and user confidence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching alisej.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
35
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the design services sector targeting a general audience. The website content is minimal and primarily serves as a digital brochure. There is no evidence of partnerships, subsidiaries, or parent companies. The business model appears to be service-based with a local focus. The lack of detailed business information, contact channels, and certifications limits the ability to assess market positioning or growth potential. The absence of social media or external business links suggests limited digital marketing efforts. The company could benefit from expanding its online presence and providing more comprehensive business and contact information to improve credibility and customer engagement.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is low. The website does not implement common security headers, lacks privacy and cookie policies, and does not provide incident response contacts. There is no evidence of vulnerability disclosure or security certifications. The absence of WHOIS registration data is a significant red flag, potentially indicating domain registration issues or privacy protection that is not justified. The business should prioritize implementing HTTPS enforcement, security headers, and transparent privacy practices. Additionally, establishing incident response procedures and vulnerability disclosure policies would improve security culture and compliance with regulations such as GDPR.

Recommendations

  1. Register the domain properly and ensure WHOIS information is accurate and publicly available to improve legitimacy.
  2. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR and enhance user trust.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to harden the website against common attacks.
  4. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for general inquiries and security incidents.
  5. Develop and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response plan to demonstrate security readiness and transparency.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
ALISE J DESIGN STUDIO
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ALISE J DESIGN STUDIO
Description
ALISE J DESIGN STUDIO is a local business based in Rīga, Latvia, located at 38 Āraišu iela. The website appears to represent a design studio business.
Key services
design services
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Wix, core-js, focus-within-polyfill
Platforms
Wix.com
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is built on Wix platform with standard Wix scripts and assets.
  2. No WHOIS registration data available, indicating possible unregistered domain or WHOIS privacy.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the content.
  5. Only physical address found in JSON-LD structured data.
  6. No social media links or external business-related links detected.
  7. No security headers or advanced security configurations detected.
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts detected beyond Wix standard scripts.
  9. Website content is minimal and basic with limited business information.
  10. No signs of adult or unsafe content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted on Wix, leveraging Wix's content delivery and platform services. The technology stack includes standard polyfills and JavaScript bundles typical for Wix sites. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization but basic SEO and accessibility features. There is no evidence of advanced frameworks or custom backend technologies. The site lacks analytics and marketing tools beyond Wix's default capabilities. Technical debt appears low due to the use of a managed platform, but the lack of security and compliance features represents a risk. Opportunities exist to enhance SEO, accessibility, and security configurations to improve overall digital maturity.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with alisej.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review alisej.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.