Skip to main content

Security report for alform.cz

LOUDA Alform, výrobní družstvo · Manufacturing · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

LOUDA Alform, výrobní družstvo is a Czech manufacturing cooperative specializing in precision machining, tooling, and assembly services for various industrial sectors including automotive, glass, ceramic, and rubber industries. The website presents a professional and well-structured digital presence with clear navigation and relevant content targeting industrial clients and educational institutions. The company leverages modern web technologies such as ASP.NET WebForms, jQuery, and Bootstrap, complemented by Google services for analytics and bot protection. Cookie consent is implemented comprehensively, reflecting GDPR compliance. However, the absence of WHOIS data and security headers slightly detracts from the overall trustworthiness and security posture. The site is accessible without WAF or security challenges, indicating stable hosting and infrastructure.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching alform.cz

This scan found 21 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention alform.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for alform.cz right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the manufacturing sector with a focus on precision CNC machining and tooling. Its business model revolves around providing specialized industrial components and assemblies, serving a medium-sized market segment primarily in the Czech Republic. The website links to reputable partners such as DMG MORI, indicating strong industry relationships. The lack of explicit contact emails and phone numbers on the main pages suggests a preference for contact via forms or direct communication channels. The company appears to maintain a consistent brand image and offers detailed product and service information, supporting its market position as a reliable regional manufacturer.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Google reCaptcha to mitigate bot traffic, which are positive security measures. Cookie consent is granular and transparent, supporting privacy compliance. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options represents a missed opportunity to enhance security. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The lack of a security.txt file or incident response contact information limits the company's readiness to handle security incidents publicly. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved with additional best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to strengthen site security.
  2. Publish a security.txt file and provide clear incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Enhance SEO and accessibility by adding structured data and improving ARIA roles and labels.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider publishing terms of service and more detailed business contact information to increase business credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
LOUDA Alform, výrobní družstvo
Description
Manufacturer specializing in precise turned and milled parts, tools for forming and pressing, hydraulic and pneumatic components, assembled subassemblies, welding fixtures, and molds for glass, ceramic and rubber industries.
Key services
Precision CNC turning and milling, Tool manufacturing, Hydraulic and pneumatic components, Assembly of subassemblies, Welding fixtures, Mold making for glass, ceramic, and rubber industries
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
ASP.NET WebForms, jQuery, Bootstrap, Google reCaptcha, Google Tag Manager, MapLibre GL JS, Cookiebot
Frameworks
ASP.NET
Platforms
Windows Server (implied by ASP.NET WebForms)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • Use of Google reCaptcha for bot protection

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics via Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google AdSense
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses HTTPS and modern cookie consent mechanisms.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable, which is unusual and reduces domain trust score.
  3. Website content is professionally presented and relevant to manufacturing industry.
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in provided HTML snippet; contact form present.
  5. No security.txt or incident response contacts found.
  6. No terms of service page detected.
  7. Cookie consent includes detailed cookie categories and third-party providers.
  8. External links to reputable domains such as Google, YouTube, and DMG MORI.
  9. Use of ASP.NET WebForms indicates legacy technology stack but still functional.
  10. No signs of malware or phishing detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on ASP.NET WebForms, a mature but older web framework, combined with jQuery and Bootstrap for UI components. It uses Google Tag Manager and reCaptcha for analytics and security. The presence of MapLibre GL JS indicates some map-related functionality. The site is mobile responsive and loads a moderate amount of resources, suggesting average performance. The lack of a modern CMS or headless architecture may limit scalability and ease of content management. No hosting provider information was found. The technical stack is functional but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with alform.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review alform.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.