Skip to main content

Security report for alfaneon.se

Alfa Neon AB · Manufacturing · Sweden

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

47/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Alfa Neon AB is a well-established Swedish company specializing in signage and profiling solutions, serving primarily the Scandinavian market with over 50 years of industry experience. The company positions itself as a leading supplier of sustainable visual communication solutions, targeting B2B customers who require comprehensive signage and facade systems to enhance their brand visibility. Their website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, supported by customer case studies and industry partnerships such as PIBE. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern frameworks like Bootstrap and uses popular libraries such as jQuery and Flickity for enhanced user experience. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly, leveraging Yoast SEO and Google Analytics for performance monitoring. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and integrates Google reCAPTCHA for form protection, though it lacks explicit security headers and published security policies, which are recommended for further hardening. Privacy compliance is addressed with a cookie banner and a privacy policy, indicating awareness of GDPR requirements. Overall, the site is trustworthy, well-maintained, and suitable for its business purpose.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
15/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching alfaneon.se

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
15
Average
47

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Alfa Neon AB operates in the manufacturing and retail sectors, focusing on signage and facade solutions. Their business model is B2B, serving global and Scandinavian clients with tailored visual communication products. The company leverages its long-standing market presence and industry expertise as competitive advantages. Revenue streams likely include product sales, installation, maintenance, and consulting services. The target customer segments are businesses requiring branding and signage solutions. The company demonstrates growth through partnerships and participation in industry organizations like PIBE. The website content and structure support a professional image and facilitate customer engagement through case studies and contact options.

Security posture

The website exhibits a moderate to good security posture with mandatory HTTPS and integration of Google reCAPTCHA to mitigate spam and abuse. However, it lacks explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which are best practices to prevent common web attacks. There is no visible security policy or incident response contact information, which could hinder effective communication in case of security incidents. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The site uses third-party scripts from trusted sources but should regularly audit these for vulnerabilities. Overall, the security maturity is adequate for the business size but could be improved with additional controls and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common attacks.
  2. Publish a security policy and provide clear incident response contact channels to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate risks from vulnerable dependencies.
  5. Enhance privacy compliance by detailing data retention policies and providing clearer user controls over tracking.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Alfa Neon AB
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Alfa Neon AB
Description
Ledande leverantör av skylt och profillösningar på den Skandinaviska marknaden som stärker kundernas visuella kommunikation. Med mer än 50 års erfarenhet levererar helhetslösningar inom skylt och profillösningar som lyfter och utvecklar kunders varumärken.
Key services
Skyltar (signs), Fasadsystem (facade systems), Profilbokstäver (profile letters), Drift och skötsel (operation and maintenance), Miljöarbete (environmental work)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap 5, Flickity, BxSlider, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, reCAPTCHA v3, FontAwesome, Yoast SEO
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA v3 implemented
  • Google Tag Manager used for analytics
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Content is in Swedish and professionally presented
  3. Strong focus on signage and visual communication solutions
  4. No explicit terms of service found
  5. Privacy and cookie policies are present and include consent mechanisms
  6. Contact information includes physical address and contact form but no explicit emails or phone numbers visible
  7. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices
  8. Security posture is good but could be improved with explicit security headers and published security policies
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.1, utilizing Bootstrap 5 for responsive design and jQuery for DOM manipulation. It incorporates modern UI libraries such as Flickity and BxSlider for interactive elements. SEO is managed via Yoast SEO Premium, ensuring proper metadata and structured data (JSON-LD) for search engines. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts and lazy loading of images. Accessibility is basic but could be improved with more ARIA attributes and keyboard navigation support. Hosting details are not explicit, but the site uses HTTPS with a good SSL configuration. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, supporting a professional user experience with room for optimization in security headers and accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with alfaneon.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review alfaneon.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.