Skip to main content

Security report for alenakaikova.lv

Alena Kaikova · Other · N/a

Medium risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website alenakaikova.lv appears to be a personal or professional portfolio site for an individual named Alena Kaikova. The site is designed with a consistent branding style and uses modern web technologies such as Google Fonts and Font Awesome icons. The content is primarily informational, targeting a general audience likely interested in the services or portfolio of the individual. The technical infrastructure is moderate, with no detected CMS or advanced frameworks, and the site appears mobile-optimized with basic accessibility features. Security posture is average due to lack of visible security headers and absence of privacy or cookie policies, which are important for compliance and trust. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting the ability to fully verify domain legitimacy. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced security and compliance features.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching alenakaikova.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business model appears to be centered on personal branding or service offering by an individual, with no explicit commercial or e-commerce components detected. The market position is not clearly defined, and no partnerships or subsidiaries are indicated. The site does not display trust indicators such as certifications or testimonials. The target audience is general, possibly clients or collaborators interested in the individual's work. The lack of contact information and privacy policies may limit user trust and engagement. There are no detected analytics or marketing tools, suggesting a low level of digital marketing maturity.

Security posture

Security maturity is basic. The site uses HTTPS (assumed from URL but not confirmed in data), but no security headers were detected in the provided content. There is no evidence of vulnerability disclosures, incident response contacts, or security certifications. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing policies and consent mechanisms. No tracking or analytics scripts were found, which reduces privacy risks but also limits business intelligence. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust verification. Recommendations include implementing security headers, privacy and cookie policies, and establishing incident response contacts to improve security posture and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Ensure WHOIS data is accessible and consistent with website claims to improve trust.
  4. Include clear contact information including company emails and phone numbers for user trust.
  5. Consider adding vulnerability disclosure and incident response information to enhance security transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Alena Kaikova
Description
Personal or professional website of Alena Kaikova, likely showcasing services or portfolio.
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Google Fonts, Font Awesome
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies detected on the site.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the content.
  4. No security or incident response policies found.
  5. Website uses multiple Google Fonts and Font Awesome icons.
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in the provided HTML.
  7. Website content is primarily informational and personal branding.
  8. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  9. No WAF or security challenge detected; site content is accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses standard HTML5 and CSS3 with external fonts loaded from fonts.bunny.net and icons from Font Awesome. No CMS or advanced JavaScript frameworks were detected. The site appears to be hosted on a platform that serves static content with images hosted on Google Cloud Storage and leadconnectorhq.com CDN. Performance is moderate with no explicit performance optimization scripts detected. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design elements. SEO is basic with meta viewport and title tags but no structured data or Open Graph tags found. Accessibility features are minimal but present. Technical risks include lack of security headers and missing privacy compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with alenakaikova.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review alenakaikova.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.