Skip to main content

Security report for albizazitkovky.cz

E-commerce · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website 'Zážitkovky Albi' appears to be an e-commerce platform focused on selling experience-based gifts or entertainment activities, targeting a Czech audience. The site is built on WordPress and uses popular plugins such as LayerSlider and Slider Revolution, with Cookiebot managing cookie consent. The technical infrastructure is modern and supports HTTPS with a good SSL configuration. However, the absence of WHOIS data and registrant information raises concerns about domain legitimacy. The website lacks explicit privacy policy and terms of service pages, and no direct contact information is found, which impacts business credibility and privacy compliance. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS and cookie consent but missing security headers and incident response details.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048
  4. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching albizazitkovky.cz

This scan found 19 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
100
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention albizazitkovky.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for albizazitkovky.cz right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business targets consumers interested in leisure and entertainment experiences, likely operating in the retail or e-commerce sector within the Czech Republic. The website branding is consistent and professionally designed, indicating a small-sized business. The lack of detailed company information, certifications, or trust signals limits the ability to assess market position or growth. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified. The business model likely revolves around direct sales of experience vouchers or similar products. The absence of contact details and privacy documentation may affect customer trust and regulatory compliance.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses a cookie consent mechanism that denies ad personalization and grants security storage, reflecting some privacy awareness. However, no advanced security headers are detected, and there is no visible incident response or security contact information. The lack of WHOIS data and registrant transparency reduces trust. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data are evident from the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved by adding security headers, privacy policies, and incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages.
  2. Add visible and verified contact information including company emails and phone numbers.
  3. Enhance security by adding HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Obtain and publish WHOIS registrant information or justify privacy protection to improve trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Website appears to promote 'Zážitkovky Albi', which suggests offering experience-based products or services, likely entertainment or leisure activities.
Key services
experience gifts, entertainment activities
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, LayerSlider, Slider Revolution, jQuery, Cookiebot
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with denied ad personalization
  • Security storage granted in consent

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cookiebot
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable, indicating possible domain registration issues or privacy protection.
  3. Website uses WordPress CMS with common plugins for sliders and cookie consent.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  5. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with denied ad personalization and granted security storage.
  6. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found on the homepage HTML.
  7. No social media links explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet.
  8. Website content is in Czech language, targeting Czech audience.
  9. No visible security headers detected in the HTML source.
  10. SSL is enabled and appears properly configured.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses WordPress CMS with LayerSlider and Slider Revolution plugins for rich content presentation. Cookiebot is integrated for cookie consent management. The site loads jQuery and Google Fonts from external sources. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO optimization is basic with meta tags present but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags detected. Hosting provider details are not evident. The site uses HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate. There is room for improvement in security headers and privacy compliance documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with albizazitkovky.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review albizazitkovky.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.