Skip to main content

Security report for albigroup.lv

Other · N/a

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.albigroup.lv is currently inaccessible beyond a BitNinja security CAPTCHA challenge page, which blocks automated or suspicious traffic. The page content is minimal and serves only to validate visitors via CAPTCHA to prevent cyber attacks. No actual business content, contact information, or company details are accessible on this page. The site uses outdated CMS versions (Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5) as indicated in meta tags, which are known to have security vulnerabilities. The technical infrastructure includes Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking, and Google reCAPTCHA for bot mitigation. However, no privacy or cookie policies are present, and no security headers or HTTPS enforcement are visible in the provided data. Overall, the site is in a blocked state, limiting the ability to analyze its true business or security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching albigroup.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
43

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the access restriction by BitNinja's CAPTCHA, no business intelligence data such as company name, market position, business model, or sector can be determined. The lack of contact information, privacy policies, or terms of service further limits insights into the company's operations or credibility. The presence of outdated CMS versions suggests potential neglect in website maintenance. No partnerships or related domains are identified from the content.

Security posture

The security posture is weak based on the available data. The site relies on BitNinja's CAPTCHA for bot protection but lacks visible security headers and HTTPS enforcement. The use of outdated CMS versions poses significant security risks. No incident response or security policy information is available. The presence of Google reCAPTCHA is a positive control against automated abuse. Overall, the site requires urgent security updates and policy implementations to improve its security maturity.

Recommendations

  1. Update the CMS platforms to the latest supported versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  2. Implement and enforce HTTPS with valid SSL/TLS certificates to secure data in transit.
  3. Add and configure essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  5. Provide accessible contact information and incident response channels to improve trust and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

BitNinja detected. The website content is a BitNinja security CAPTCHA challenge page blocking direct access to the actual site content. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, reCAPTCHA, Joomla! 1.5, WordPress 2.5
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for bot mitigation

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is currently blocked by a BitNinja security CAPTCHA challenge page.
  2. No actual business content is accessible on the provided page.
  3. CMS versions indicated in meta tags are outdated and vulnerable.
  4. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  5. No contact information or business details are present.
  6. Use of Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking.
  7. No visible security headers or HTTPS enforcement detected.
  8. No social media or company contact emails or phone numbers found.
  9. Page is primarily a security gate to prevent automated access.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses legacy CMS platforms Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5, both of which are outdated and unsupported, increasing risk exposure. The site integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for user tracking and Google reCAPTCHA for bot mitigation. The page is mobile responsive to a basic degree but lacks advanced accessibility and SEO optimizations. Performance is moderate but cannot be fully assessed due to the blocking CAPTCHA. The technical debt is high due to outdated software and missing security best practices. Modernization and security hardening are recommended to reduce operational risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with albigroup.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review albigroup.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.