Skip to main content

Security report for aktycova.cz

Tycová & partneři, advokátní kancelář s.r.o. · Other · Czech Republic

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Tycová & partneři, advokátní kancelář s.r.o. is a Czech law firm established in 2013, offering a broad range of legal services to entrepreneurs, municipalities, non-profits, and private individuals. The firm positions itself as a trusted and professional partner with a strong local presence in Prague. Their website reflects a professional image with detailed team profiles and published legal works, supporting their credibility in the legal sector. Technically, the site is built on Joomla CMS with Gantry 5 framework and uses modern web technologies, providing a good user experience and mobile optimization. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS and CSRF tokens but lacks explicit security headers and cookie consent mechanisms, which are recommended for compliance and protection. Overall, the domain registration data aligns well with the business claims, indicating legitimacy and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching aktycova.cz

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The firm targets small and medium-sized enterprises, local governments, and non-profit organizations, offering specialized legal services including civil law, dispute resolution, intellectual property, and administrative law. Their business model is service-oriented, focusing on personalized legal consultancy. The presence of published legal monographs by team members enhances their market positioning as knowledgeable experts. Partnerships with entities like DataLEGIS and banking references indicate a stable operational ecosystem. The firm maintains a small but professional team, emphasizing quality and trust in their client relationships.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and includes CSRF tokens, indicating basic security awareness. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of a cookie consent mechanism represent compliance and security gaps. No incident response or security policy is published, which could hinder rapid response to security events. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The security score is moderate, with recommendations to enhance headers, privacy compliance, and incident response readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Add a visible cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and ePrivacy Directive requirements.
  3. Publish a dedicated privacy policy page and incident response contact information on the website.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and CMS components to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO optimization to improve user experience and search rankings.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
TYCOVÁ & partneři, advokátní kancelář s.r.o.
VAT number
CZ06756786
Registration number
067 56 786
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Tycová & partneři, advokátní kancelář s.r.o.
Description
Tycová & partneři is a Czech law firm providing a comprehensive range of high-quality legal services and consultancy for small and medium entrepreneurs, municipalities, non-profit organizations, and private individuals.
Key services
Civil law, Dispute agenda, Debt collection and management, Compensation for damages and non-material harm caused by public authorities, Legal services for local governments, Copyright law, Industrial property rights and trademarks, Family law, Housing law, Commercial companies and cooperatives
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Joomla CMS, Gantry 5 Framework, Bootstrap, jQuery, Font Awesome
Frameworks
Gantry 5
Platforms
Joomla
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage (implied by base href https://aktycova.cz/)
  • CSRF token present in scripts

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich for a law firm
  2. No privacy or cookie policy pages explicitly found except a downloadable PDF for consumer information
  3. No visible forms for direct contact; contact is via email and phone
  4. No social media links detected
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies published
  6. No advertising or tracking scripts detected
  7. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and consistency
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Joomla CMS with Gantry 5 framework, leveraging Bootstrap and jQuery libraries. The site uses modern fonts from Google Fonts and Font Awesome icons. Performance is moderate with carousel and animation scripts. Mobile optimization is good, but accessibility features are basic. The hosting and domain registrar is Active24, a known Czech provider. The site lacks advanced analytics or tracking scripts, indicating minimal user tracking. Technical debt appears low, but improvements in security headers and privacy compliance are needed to modernize the infrastructure.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with aktycova.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review aktycova.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.