Skip to main content

Security report for akrij.com

Akrij Design Studio · Other · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

52/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website akrij.com appears to represent Akrij Design Studio, a small entity with a domain registered since 2001. The site is minimalistic and primarily serves as a CMS platform but currently suffers from visible PHP errors and warnings, indicating poor maintenance and technical issues. The technology stack is outdated, relying on jQuery 1.10.2 and Fancybox, with no modern frameworks or CMS platforms detected. Hosting is provided by Gransy, s.r.o., a known registrar. From a security perspective, the website lacks HTTPS information and security headers, exposing it to potential risks. The presence of PHP errors and SQL-related warnings publicly visible indicates poor error handling and potential vulnerabilities. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are present, and no contact information or forms are available, which negatively impacts trust and compliance. Overall, the website's risk profile is elevated due to technical and security shortcomings. The domain registration is consistent and longstanding, which supports legitimacy, but the website's poor content quality and security posture reduce confidence. Strategic improvements in security, privacy compliance, and technical modernization are recommended to enhance trustworthiness and user experience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching akrij.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
40
Email security
62
DNS health
65
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
50
Average
52

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Akrij Design Studio appears to be a small design-focused entity with a longstanding domain registration dating back to 2001. The lack of detailed business information, contact details, or service descriptions limits insight into market positioning or revenue streams. The business model likely revolves around design services, but no explicit offerings or target customer segments are identified. The absence of partnerships or subsidiaries suggests a standalone operation. The website's minimal content and outdated technology indicate limited digital maturity and potential underinvestment in online presence.

Security posture

The current security posture is weak. The website exposes PHP errors and warnings, which can leak sensitive information and aid attackers. There is no evidence of HTTPS enforcement or security headers, increasing vulnerability to interception and attacks. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present. Overall, the site lacks fundamental security best practices and requires urgent remediation to protect data and improve trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure all communications.
  2. Suppress PHP errors from public view and improve error handling to prevent information leakage.
  3. Add and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Develop and publish privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users.
  5. Add clear contact information and consider implementing a secure contact form to improve business credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Akrij Design Studio
Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.10.2, Fancybox
Performance
slow
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
poor
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
15/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is minimal and contains visible PHP errors and warnings.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact information or forms detected.
  4. No security headers or HTTPS information provided; potential security risks present.
  5. Domain is registered with a known registrar and is not privacy protected.
  6. Website appears to be a custom CMS with outdated technology (jQuery 1.10.2).
  7. No analytics or marketing tools detected.
  8. No social media or external business links found.
  9. Overall website quality and professionalism are poor.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses an outdated technology stack including jQuery 1.10.2 and Fancybox, with a custom CMS indicated by the page title and URL structure. Hosting is provided by Gransy, s.r.o., a known registrar. The site suffers from visible PHP errors and warnings, indicating poor error handling and potential backend issues. There is no evidence of modern frameworks or platforms, and no performance or accessibility optimizations are apparent. The site is not mobile optimized beyond basic viewport settings. SEO is poor due to lack of meaningful metadata and content. Technical debt is high, and modernization is recommended to improve stability, security, and user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with akrij.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review akrij.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.