Skip to main content

Security report for akmenkalis.com

Akmeņkalis Reinis Martinsons · Other · Latvia

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

47/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Akmeņkalis Reinis Martinsons is a small Latvian business specializing in stone processing and the creation and installation of grave monuments and related stone products. The website presents a clear and professional depiction of their services, targeting individuals seeking memorial stonework. The business claims over 10 years of experience, consistent with the domain registration date from 2012. The site uses a modern front-end technology stack including Bootstrap, jQuery, and Font Awesome, with Google Analytics integrated for visitor tracking. The technical infrastructure appears stable though no CMS is detected, suggesting a custom or static site setup. From a security perspective, the website uses HTTPS and includes some basic best practices but lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC is not enabled, representing minor security gaps. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating compliance shortcomings with GDPR or similar regulations. Contact information is clearly provided, enhancing business credibility. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available. Overall, the website is functional and professional but would benefit from improved privacy compliance and enhanced security configurations to reduce risk and increase trustworthiness. The domain registration data supports the legitimacy of the business with consistent information and a stable registration status.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching akmenkalis.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
47

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in a niche local market providing stone monument fabrication and installation services primarily in Latvia. Its competitive advantage lies in over a decade of experience and personalized service offerings including custom engraving and installation. The business model is service-oriented, targeting individual customers and families needing memorial stones. Revenue streams likely come from direct sales of monuments and related stone products. The website presence is modest but professional, indicating a small business with a focused local customer base. Partnerships or subsidiaries are not evident. The use of Google Analytics suggests some interest in tracking customer engagement and potential growth. The lack of privacy and cookie policies may limit expansion into more regulated markets.

Security posture

The security posture is moderate. The site uses HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data in the HTML. However, the absence of DNSSEC, security headers such as CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security level. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which is a gap in security culture and readiness. The site uses third-party libraries like jQuery and Bootstrap, which appear up to date but no explicit vulnerability scanning is evident. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, the site is functional but could improve significantly in security hardening and compliance to reduce risk.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.
  4. Add a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure policy to improve incident response readiness.
  5. Review SSL/TLS configuration to ensure strong cipher suites and enable HSTS for HTTPS enforcement.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Akmeņkalis Reinis Martinsons
Description
Akmeņkalis Reinis Martinsons offers stone processing services including gravēšana (engraving), kapu pieminekļi (grave monuments), kapu apmales (grave borders), and related stonework primarily in Latvia.
Key services
Stone processing, Gravēšana (engraving), Kapu pieminekļi (grave monuments), Kapu apmales (grave borders), Installation and delivery
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, jQuery, Bootstrap, Font Awesome, Lightbox2, ScrollReveal, Google Analytics
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by base href and external scripts loaded via HTTPS)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a small local business site for stone monument services in Latvia.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented with email and phone.
  4. No security.txt or incident response info available.
  5. Use of modern front-end libraries and Google Analytics for tracking.
  6. No CMS detected; likely a custom or static site.
  7. No visible security headers or advanced security configurations.
  8. Domain registration is stable and consistent with business claims.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end stack with Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for DOM manipulation, Font Awesome for icons, and Lightbox2 for image galleries. Google Analytics is integrated for visitor tracking. The site is hosted under a GoDaddy registrar but hosting provider specifics are not explicit. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected. Mobile optimization is good due to Bootstrap usage. Accessibility is basic with no ARIA landmarks or advanced features detected. SEO is basic with meta description and keywords present but no structured data or Open Graph tags. The site is likely custom-built or static with no CMS detected. Technical debt appears low but security and privacy compliance require improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with akmenkalis.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review akmenkalis.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.