Skip to main content

Security report for akl.lv

AKL.LV SIA · Manufacturing · Latvia

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AKL.LV SIA is a Latvian small-sized manufacturing company specializing in the production of high-quality custom corpus furniture. The company emphasizes the use of modern and durable materials such as laminated chipboard, acrylic, and MDF to deliver functional and aesthetically pleasing furniture solutions for residential and commercial clients. The website reflects a professional and well-structured digital presence, showcasing project galleries and providing clear contact information. Technically, the site employs modern frontend technologies including Bootstrap, jQuery, and Google services for analytics and user interaction. However, the absence of explicit privacy and cookie policies and lack of security headers indicate areas for improvement in compliance and security posture. The WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the website is safe, professional, and credible but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  4. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching akl.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a trusted partner in the furniture manufacturing sector with a focus on quality and design. Its business model revolves around manufacturing and direct sales of custom furniture, targeting both residential and commercial markets. The website content and gallery suggest a portfolio of completed projects, indicating operational experience and customer engagement. The use of multiple languages hints at a broader regional audience. The lack of visible certifications or formal security policies suggests a small to medium enterprise with room for growth in compliance and trust-building measures. The company maintains direct contact channels and leverages Google tools for marketing and analytics, indicating a moderate digital marketing maturity.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS and integrates Google reCAPTCHA for form protection, which are positive security practices. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces the overall security posture. No evidence of vulnerability disclosures, incident response contacts, or security certifications was found. The lack of privacy and cookie policies also indicates potential GDPR compliance gaps. The site does not appear to be behind a WAF or security challenge, and no suspicious or malicious content was detected. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended headers, policies, and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements and consent mechanisms.
  2. Add essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Conduct a security audit of third-party libraries and update them regularly to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Establish and publish an incident response policy and contact channels for security issues to improve transparency and trust.
  5. Improve accessibility features and SEO optimization to enhance user experience and search engine visibility.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
AKL.LV SIA
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
AKL.LV SIA
Description
AKL.LV is a company specializing in manufacturing high-quality custom furniture, particularly corpus furniture, using modern and durable materials such as laminated chipboard, acrylic, and MDF. They emphasize combining functionality with design to create aesthetically pleasing and long-lasting furniture, targeting residential and commercial spaces.
Key services
Custom corpus furniture manufacturing, Use of high-quality materials, Design and production services
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 5.3.3, jQuery 3.6.0, Font Awesome 6.0.0, Google Fonts (Roboto), MDB UI Kit 6.0.1, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by external scripts loaded via https)
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA on forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible and functional with rich content.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies explicitly found.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented including phone, email, address, and contact form.
  4. No security headers detected in the provided data; security posture could be improved.
  5. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; limits domain legitimacy verification.
  6. Use of modern frontend technologies and external libraries.
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  8. No adult or NSFW content present.
  9. Google Analytics and Tag Manager used for tracking with no visible consent mechanism.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using a modern frontend stack with Bootstrap 5.3.3, jQuery 3.6.0, Font Awesome 6.0.0, and MDB UI Kit 6.0.1. It uses Google Fonts for typography and integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking. The site is mobile responsive with a clean layout and smooth navigation. Performance is moderate, with some use of large background images and multiple gallery images that may impact load times. No CMS or backend platform was detected from the HTML content. Hosting provider details are not available. The site uses Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms from spam. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from performance optimization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with akl.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review akl.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.