Skip to main content

Security report for aki.ee

Other · Estonia

High risk. 20 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website aki.ee is currently inaccessible beyond a Cloudflare Turnstile human verification challenge page, which blocks access to any substantive content. The domain is registered to Elkdata OÜ, an Estonian company, with a domain age of over a decade, indicating a stable registration history. However, due to the blocking mechanism, no business descriptions, contact information, or policy documents are available for review. The site leverages Cloudflare's security and analytics services, but no further technical or content details can be assessed. This limits the ability to evaluate the website's digital maturity or security posture comprehensively. From a security perspective, the presence of Cloudflare's challenge indicates an active defense against automated threats, but the lack of visible security headers or policies in the accessible content prevents a full security assessment. The WHOIS data suggests legitimacy and consistency with the domain's country of registration. Overall, the site appears to be protected by modern security infrastructure but lacks publicly accessible information for deeper analysis. Given the current state, the website's risk assessment is limited by the lack of accessible content. Strategic recommendations focus on enabling access for legitimate users and publishing essential compliance and contact information to improve trust and transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

20 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: Telnet

      Port 23 (Telnet) is publicly accessible - Telnet - Unencrypted remote access

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to Telnet using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: SMB

      Port 445 (SMB) is publicly accessible - SMB - Windows file sharing, high risk

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to SMB using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MSSQL

      Port 1433 (MSSQL) is publicly accessible - MSSQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MSSQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: Oracle

      Port 1521 (Oracle) is publicly accessible - Oracle - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to Oracle using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching aki.ee

This scan found 35 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
55
Email security
80
DNS health
70
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
10
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The domain aki.ee is registered to Elkdata OÜ, an Estonian entity, with no visible business information or descriptions on the accessible page. The lack of accessible content prevents identification of market positioning, business model, or key services. No partner or subsidiary domains were identified. The website appears to be in a protected state, possibly under maintenance or strict security controls, limiting business intelligence extraction. The domain age and registration consistency suggest a stable presence, but no growth indicators or partnership ecosystems are visible.

Security posture

The website employs Cloudflare's Turnstile challenge, indicating a proactive approach to mitigating automated threats and bot traffic. However, the absence of visible security headers, privacy policies, or incident response contacts in the accessible content limits the assessment of security maturity. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected, but the inability to access the main content restricts comprehensive evaluation. The WHOIS data shows no privacy protection, which is positive for transparency. Overall, the security posture appears cautious but lacks publicly available documentation or policies.

Recommendations

  1. Reduce or customize WAF challenge to allow legitimate user access and enable content analysis.
  2. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies to demonstrate GDPR compliance and build user trust.
  3. Provide visible contact information including security incident response contacts.
  4. Implement and expose security headers to improve security posture and compliance.
  5. Enhance website content accessibility and SEO to improve business credibility and user experience.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Cloudflare detected. Website is presenting a Cloudflare Turnstile human verification challenge page blocking access to actual content. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Content quality
poor

Technology

Stack
Cloudflare Turnstile, Cloudflare Challenge Platform, Cloudflare Insights Beacon
SEO
poor

Analytics and tracking

Services
Cloudflare Insights
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cloudflare Insights
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is blocked by Cloudflare Turnstile challenge, preventing access to actual site content.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the accessible content.
  3. No contact information or business details are exposed on the challenge page.
  4. The site uses Cloudflare security and analytics services.
  5. No forms or data collection fields are visible beyond the challenge widget.
  6. No social media or external business links found in the accessible content.
  7. WHOIS data shows a stable, long-registered domain with no privacy protection.
  8. Due to blocking, most content and security posture analysis is incomplete.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted behind Cloudflare, utilizing their Turnstile CAPTCHA and challenge platform, which provides bot mitigation and security analytics. The technical stack includes Cloudflare's JavaScript beacon for insights. No CMS or additional frameworks are detectable due to content blocking. Performance and mobile optimization cannot be assessed. The HTML is minimal and focused on the challenge page, lacking meta tags or SEO elements. The site does not enable DNSSEC, which is a minor security improvement opportunity. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern but currently restricts content access, limiting operational transparency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with aki.ee. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review aki.ee.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.