Skip to main content

Security report for akeo.com.br

Akeo · Manufacturing · Brazil

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Akeo is a Brazilian manufacturing company specializing in furniture accessories and edge banding tapes, with over 40 years of market experience. The company offers a diverse product portfolio including aluminum and plastic handles, profiles, feet for counters, appliques, and organizers, alongside customized solutions emphasizing innovation and sustainability. Their target market includes furniture manufacturers and designers seeking quality and differentiated products. Technically, the website employs modern front-end technologies such as Bootstrap, jQuery, and animation libraries, with hosting infrastructure linked to Google Cloud DNS services. However, the site lacks a valid SSL certificate and modern TLS support, exposing it to security risks. The presence of SPF and DMARC records indicates some email security awareness, but DNSSEC and other security headers are missing. Privacy and cookie policies are present with consent mechanisms, but terms of service and incident response information are absent. Overall, the digital maturity is moderate with room for security and compliance improvements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching akeo.com.br

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Security headers
15
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
85
GDPR outside view
25
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Akeo holds a solid position in the manufacturing sector focused on furniture accessories in Brazil. Their competitive advantage lies in product innovation, quality, and sustainability commitments. The business model revolves around B2B sales and custom product development, supported by a professional website with integrated marketing and social media channels. The company engages customers via newsletter subscriptions with explicit consent and maintains active social media profiles. Partnerships include a recruitment platform (skeel.com.br) and a design studio responsible for website development. Growth indicators include a comprehensive product catalog and sustainability initiatives. However, the absence of detailed compliance and security policies may impact trust with more security-conscious clients.

Security posture

The current security posture is basic with significant gaps. The absence of a valid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols critically undermine secure communications, exposing users to potential interception and data integrity risks. While SPF and DMARC records are correctly configured to protect email domains, the lack of DNSSEC and CAA records reduces DNS security. No HTTP security headers are implemented, and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are published. The cookie consent mechanism is implemented, but GDPR compliance is uncertain due to lack of detailed privacy policy content. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, requiring urgent improvements to protect business operations and customer data.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS and secure all website traffic.
  2. Enable and enforce modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 or TLS 1.3) and disable outdated or insecure protocols.
  3. Implement essential HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Enable DNSSEC and configure CAA records to enhance DNS security and certificate issuance control.
  5. Publish a security.txt file and clearly define incident response contact channels to improve vulnerability management and transparency.
  6. Enhance privacy policy to explicitly address GDPR and other relevant data protection regulations, improving compliance and user trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end stack including Bootstrap 5.2, jQuery, AOS for animations, and Simple Parallax JS for visual effects, indicating a focus on user experience and design quality. Hosting is supported by Google Cloud DNS services, but the IP address provider is not clearly identified. Performance is moderate with a page load time of approximately 4.5 seconds and a page size of 367 KB, which is acceptable but could be optimized. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design elements. SEO and accessibility are basic, with no structured data or Open Graph metadata detected. The site includes Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing tracking, reflecting moderate user tracking practices. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports business needs but requires security and SEO enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with akeo.com.br. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review akeo.com.br.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.