Skip to main content

Security report for akaprint.lv

Other · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

52/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.akaprint.lv represents a Latvian small business specializing in printing promotional and business gift items such as apparel, bags, office supplies, and various branded merchandise. The site is currently password protected, restricting access to its full content and limiting the ability to assess the business comprehensively. The visible metadata and descriptions indicate a focus on souvenir printing and business gifts targeting a general Latvian audience. Technically, the site uses common web technologies including Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking, Google Fonts, and Font Awesome icons. However, no CMS or hosting provider details are evident, and the site lacks visible security headers or advanced SEO features. The security posture is limited by the absence of HTTPS verification in the provided data and no visible security policies or incident response information. The cookie consent mechanism is present and functional, indicating some level of privacy compliance. Overall, the site’s risk profile is moderate due to limited transparency and blocked content, with recommendations to improve security headers, publish privacy and security policies, and provide accessible contact information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching akaprint.lv

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
52

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business appears to operate in the promotional products and printing sector within Latvia, offering a broad range of customizable items for corporate gifting and advertising. The business model likely revolves around B2B sales of branded merchandise. Market positioning and competitive advantages cannot be fully assessed due to restricted site access. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified. The use of Google Analytics suggests an interest in tracking visitor behavior, but the lack of visible contact details or certifications limits trust signals. Growth indicators and revenue streams are not discernible from the available data.

Security posture

The website currently lacks visible security best practices such as security headers and published security policies. The absence of WHOIS data due to query limits prevents verification of domain legitimacy and registrant details, which is a risk factor. The password protection on the main content may be a security measure or indicate a development stage, but it also restricts transparency. No incident response contacts or vulnerability disclosure policies are found. The cookie consent banner is a positive privacy compliance indicator. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, with significant room for improvement in transparency, policy publication, and technical security controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and verify configuration.
  2. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish clear privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies accessible to users.
  4. Provide visible and verified contact information including support and security contacts.
  5. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response procedures.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

None detected. Website content is password protected, requiring a password to access main content. No WAF challenge detected. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Description
SUVENĪRU APDRUKA,BIZNESA DĀVANAS,LIETUSSARGI,T-KREKLI,JAKAS,FLĪSA JAKAS,CEPURES,ŠALLES, PILDSPALVAS,ZĪMUĻI,ATSTAROTĀJI,KONFEKTES,METĀLA PLĀKSNĪTES,SOMAS,MAISIŅI,MUGURSOMAS, BIROJA PIEDERUMI,METĀLA PLĀKSNĪTES,TERMO KRŪZES,KRŪZES,LUKTURĪŠI,ŪDENS PUDELES,USB, LĀDĒTĀJI,ŠĶILTAVAS
Key services
Souvenir printing, Business gifts, Umbrellas, T-shirts, Jackets, Fleece jackets, Caps, Scarves, Pens, Pencils
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Font Awesome, Google Fonts, JavaScript, CSS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is fully password protected, blocking access to main content.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  3. Cookie consent banner present with options for consent management.
  4. No visible contact information or privacy/terms pages found.
  5. Uses Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking.
  6. No security headers detected in HTML content.
  7. No explicit adult or questionable content detected.
  8. Website is in Latvian language targeting Latvian market.
  9. Site appears to be a small business focused on promotional printing products.
  10. Limited SEO and accessibility features observed.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses standard web technologies including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Google Fonts, and Font Awesome icons. The HTML structure is basic with some inline scripts for cookie consent management. The site is mobile responsive to a basic degree but lacks advanced accessibility and SEO optimizations. No CMS or hosting provider information is detectable. Performance is moderate but cannot be fully assessed due to password protection. The site would benefit from modernization efforts including improved SEO metadata, accessibility features, and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with akaprint.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review akaprint.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.