Skip to main content

Security report for ajcgroupe.com

AJC Groupe · Other · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

52/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AJC Groupe is a Latvian-based marketing service provider specializing in helping local businesses such as construction companies, real estate agents, and online enterprises increase their monthly revenue by $3K to $50K through social media and Meta advertising campaigns. The website is built using modern tools like Framer and hosted on Squarespace with Google Cloud DNS services. While the site presents a professional design and clear business proposition, it lacks critical compliance elements such as privacy and cookie policies, as well as explicit contact information. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled and domain status protections in place, but DNSSEC is not enabled and security headers are missing. Google Analytics is used for tracking without visible consent mechanisms, indicating privacy compliance gaps. Overall, the website is functional and targeted but requires improvements in privacy, security, and transparency to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  4. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ajcgroupe.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
40
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
52

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets local Latvian businesses seeking to leverage Meta advertising for revenue growth, positioning itself as a performance-driven marketing partner with a money-back guarantee. The business model focuses on service delivery via digital marketing campaigns. The website content and domain age align with a recently founded small business (2023). There is no evidence of parent or subsidiary relationships. The marketing approach is direct and focused on measurable financial outcomes. The lack of detailed business credentials or certifications limits the perceived credibility. The use of modern web technologies and analytics tools suggests a digitally mature operation, though privacy and compliance practices need enhancement.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and domain registration protections, which are positive security indicators. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security reduces the overall security robustness. No incident response or security contact information is provided, which is a compliance and operational risk. The use of Google Analytics without a cookie consent mechanism indicates potential GDPR non-compliance. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved with standard best practices and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit user consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to improve site security.
  4. Publish clear contact information including emails and phone numbers, and provide incident response contacts for security issues.
  5. Conduct a privacy impact assessment and update analytics usage to ensure minimal and compliant user tracking.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
AJC Groupe
Description
Mēs palīdzam vietējiem uzņēmumiem, piemēram, būvniecības kompānijām, nekustamo īpašumu aģentiem un online uzņēmumiem, nopelnīt papildus $3K–$50K mēnesī ieņēmumos, izmantojot sociālos medijus un Meta reklāmas — vai arī atmaksājam jūsu naudu
Key services
Meta reklāmas, Sociālo mediju mārketings, Ieņēmumu palielināšana vietējiem uzņēmumiem
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Framer, Google Analytics, Voiceflow Widget
Frameworks
Framer
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientDeleteProhibited and clientTransferProhibited set

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Meta Ads, Voiceflow Widget
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is built using Framer and hosted on Squarespace domains with Google Cloud DNS
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses explicitly provided
  4. Google Analytics is used for tracking without visible cookie consent mechanism
  5. No security headers detected in provided data
  6. DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a security improvement opportunity
  7. Website content is in Latvian language targeting local businesses
  8. No signs of adult or questionable content
  9. No incident response or security contact information found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Framer platform and hosted via Squarespace domains with Google Cloud DNS. It uses Google Analytics for visitor tracking and includes a Voiceflow widget script. The site is mobile optimized with good design quality and basic accessibility features. SEO optimization is basic with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate, likely due to external scripts and hosting setup. The lack of DNSSEC and security headers represents technical debt and security risk. The site does not expose sensitive data or use outdated libraries. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern but requires security and compliance enhancements to reduce risks and improve trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ajcgroupe.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ajcgroupe.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.