Skip to main content

Security report for aivako.lv

Aivako · Other · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Aivako is a Latvian small design and web development studio specializing in website creation, logo design, corporate style development, and marketing services. The company highlights a portfolio of over 80 completed projects, targeting businesses and organizations seeking professional design and digital marketing solutions. The website is well-structured, professionally designed, and includes client testimonials and a portfolio showcasing their work, which supports their credibility in the market. Technically, the site uses a combination of jQuery, Bootstrap, and third-party analytics tools such as Google Analytics and Hotjar, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The site is mobile-optimized and uses HTTPS, but lacks visible privacy and cookie policies, which is a compliance gap. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS but could be improved by adding security headers and updating libraries. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy and professional business but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching aivako.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Aivako operates in the design and marketing sector, focusing on small to medium-sized clients primarily in Latvia. Their business model is service-based, delivering customized design and web development projects. The presence of multiple client testimonials and partner logos indicates a stable client base and partnership ecosystem. The company leverages digital marketing tools and analytics to support its operations. However, the lack of detailed business registration information and WHOIS data limits external verification of legitimacy. The company appears to maintain a good reputation within its niche, with a focus on quality and client satisfaction. Growth opportunities may include expanding privacy compliance and enhancing security measures to meet evolving regulatory requirements.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture. HTTPS is properly implemented, ensuring encrypted communications. However, no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, or X-Content-Type-Options were detected, which are important for mitigating common web attacks. The use of outdated jQuery (version 1.11.0) could pose vulnerabilities if not regularly patched. The absence of visible privacy and cookie policies indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other data protection regulations. No incident response or security policy information is provided, which may impact the organization's readiness to handle security incidents. Overall, while no critical vulnerabilities are evident, improvements in security headers, library updates, and privacy compliance are recommended to strengthen the security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Update JavaScript libraries, especially jQuery, to the latest secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  4. Establish and communicate an incident response plan and security policy to improve organizational security readiness.
  5. Enhance transparency by providing clear business registration details and contact information including phone numbers and physical addresses.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Aivako
Description
Aivako nodarbojas ar dizainu un mājas lapu izstrādi, logotipu un korporatīvo stilu veidošanu, kā arī ar mārketingu. Aivako jau paveikti vairāk kā 80 projektu, pievēršot uzmanību pat vissīkākajām detaļām.
Key services
Website design and development, Logo design, Corporate style creation, Marketing services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.11.0, Bootstrap, jQuery bxSlider, jQuery Sticky Kit, jQuery Parallax, Google Fonts, Facebook SDK, Google Analytics, Hotjar
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of Facebook SDK and Google Analytics asynchronously

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Hotjar
Marketing tools
Facebook SDK, Hotjar
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF detected.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. Contact information is limited to an email in meta tag and contact page link; no phone numbers or physical addresses explicitly found.
  4. Website uses multiple third-party analytics and tracking tools without visible cookie consent.
  5. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error, limiting domain trust verification.
  6. Website content is professional, focused on design and marketing services.
  7. Client testimonials and portfolio projects provide trust signals.
  8. No security headers detected in the provided data; HTTPS is enabled.
  9. No forms explicitly detailed in the HTML content provided, but contact forms are referenced.
  10. Social media presence limited to Facebook link.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a traditional front-end stack with jQuery 1.11.0, Bootstrap, and several jQuery plugins for sliders, sticky elements, and parallax effects. Google Fonts are used for typography. Analytics and tracking are implemented via Google Analytics and Hotjar, with Facebook SDK integrated for social media features. The site is served over HTTPS, indicating a secure transport layer. Performance appears moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive design elements and viewport meta tags. However, the use of older jQuery versions suggests some technical debt. No CMS or backend platform is explicitly detected. The site lacks advanced security headers and visible privacy compliance features, indicating areas for modernization and compliance improvement.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with aivako.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review aivako.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.