Skip to main content

Security report for aise.eu

A.I.S.E. · Other · Belgium

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

A.I.S.E. is a European industry association representing the cleaning and maintenance products sector. The website serves as a professional platform to communicate the association's priorities, sustainability efforts, regulatory engagement, and consumer education. The organization positions itself as a key stakeholder in promoting safe, sustainable, and effective cleaning products across Europe. The site is well designed, mobile optimized, and integrates social media feeds to enhance engagement. Technically, it is built on WordPress with modern SEO and performance plugins, ensuring a good user experience and search visibility. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and no visible vulnerabilities, though some security headers could be improved. Privacy compliance is good with clear policies, though a cookie consent mechanism is absent. Overall, the site reflects a credible and professional organization with a strong market position in its sector.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching aise.eu

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The association operates as a non-profit industry body focused on advocacy, sustainability reporting, and consumer awareness. It targets industry members, policymakers, and consumers interested in cleaning product safety and environmental impact. The business model revolves around membership services, regulatory influence, and public communication. The website content and social media presence indicate active engagement with EU regulatory processes and sustainability initiatives. The organization benefits from partnerships with other European associations and maintains a transparent communication channel with stakeholders. Growth indicators include recent news updates and strategic priorities aligned with EU Green Deal objectives.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and no exposed sensitive data. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as CSP and HSTS suggests room for improvement. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is publicly available, which could be enhanced to improve transparency and trust. The site uses reputable plugins and scripts, minimizing risk from vulnerable libraries. Forms are minimal and primarily search-based, reducing attack surface. Overall, the security maturity is good but could benefit from formalized policies and additional technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner to comply fully with GDPR cookie requirements.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to enhance transparency.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly audit and update all third-party plugins and scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Registration number
Chamber of Commerce
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
A.I.S.E.
Description
A.I.S.E. is the international association representing the cleaning and maintenance products industry in Europe. It is a network of manufacturers, suppliers, and national associations working to ensure cleanliness, hygiene, sustainability, science, product stewardship, and safe use of cleaning products.
Key services
Advocacy, Sustainability reporting, Consumer education, Industry research, Regulatory engagement
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, WP Rocket, jQuery, FontAwesome, Juicer.io (social feed)
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (WP Rocket for performance and caching)

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Juicer.io (social media feed)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional industry association site for cleaning and maintenance products in Europe.
  2. Content is well structured with clear navigation and multiple priority areas.
  3. Active social media integration with LinkedIn and YouTube.
  4. No signs of malicious content or security blocking.
  5. Use of modern WordPress plugins and SEO tools.
  6. Contact information is clearly provided with physical address, phone, and email.
  7. No explicit terms of service page found.
  8. Cookie policy present but no explicit consent mechanism detected.
  9. No visible security incident response or vulnerability disclosure pages.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.1, leveraging Yoast SEO for search optimization and WP Rocket for caching and performance improvements. It uses jQuery and FontAwesome for UI elements and integrates Juicer.io for social media feeds. The site is mobile responsive with good accessibility basics but could improve ARIA roles and keyboard navigation. Performance is moderate with lazy loading implemented for images and videos. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified but the domain registrar is GANDI, a reputable provider. The site uses canonical URLs and structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO. No major technical debt is evident, but security headers and cookie consent mechanisms are areas for enhancement.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with aise.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review aise.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.