Skip to main content

Security report for airt.at

Wiener Städtische Versicherungsverein · Other · Austria

High risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.airt.at represents the cultural exhibition series "Architektur im Ringturm" managed by the Wiener Städtische Versicherungsverein, part of the Vienna Insurance Group. It serves as a platform to showcase architectural and cultural exhibitions primarily focused on Central and Eastern Europe. The site offers detailed information about current and past exhibitions, architecture talks, and historical context of the Ringturm building. It targets architecture and culture enthusiasts and operates as a free-entry exhibition series supported by sponsorships. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins and libraries, including multilingual support and spam protection via Google reCAPTCHA. The website demonstrates good digital maturity with responsive design, SEO optimization, and accessibility considerations. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and spam prevention on forms, though some security headers could be improved. Privacy compliance is strong, featuring a comprehensive privacy policy, cookie consent banner with opt-in, and GDPR-aligned data collection practices. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and well-maintained, reflecting the reputable parent organization. No critical security or compliance issues were detected.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching airt.at

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
43
Average
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the cultural sector as an important entity under the Vienna Insurance Group umbrella. It leverages its market position to promote architectural heritage and cultural dialogue through exhibitions and talks. The business model is non-commercial, focusing on cultural enrichment and public engagement, supported by sponsorship and institutional backing. The target audience includes architecture professionals, students, cultural tourists, and the general public interested in art and architecture. The website's partnership with the Vienna Insurance Group and related domains strengthens its credibility and outreach. Growth indicators include ongoing exhibitions and active event programming. The company maintains a clear brand identity and consistent messaging aligned with its cultural mission.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and Google reCAPTCHA integration to mitigate spam and abuse on contact forms. Cookie consent mechanisms comply with GDPR requirements, providing users control over tracking technologies. However, explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options are not visibly implemented, representing an area for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly disclosed, which could be enhanced to improve transparency and readiness. Overall, the security measures are adequate for the site's purpose but could benefit from additional hardening and formalized disclosure.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and user trust.
  3. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate risks from known vulnerabilities.
  4. Consider adding a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  5. Enhance monitoring and logging of form submissions and site activity to detect and respond to potential abuse.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Wiener Städtische Versicherungsverein
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Wiener Städtische Versicherungsverein
Description
Ausstellungsreihe "Architektur im Ringturm" mit Fokus auf Architektur, Kunst und Kultur, präsentiert vom Wiener Städtischen Versicherungsverein. Die Website informiert über aktuelle und vergangene Ausstellungen, Architektur Talks, Geschichte des Ringturms und bietet Newsletter- und Kontaktmöglichkeiten.
Key services
Ausstellungen, Architektur Talks, Newsletter, Sponsoring & Pressekontakte
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, PHP, jQuery 3.7.1, Google reCAPTCHA v2, Font Awesome 4.3.0, Tag Commander, Yoast SEO plugin, Formidable Forms plugin, WPML (multilingual plugin)
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA v2 on forms to prevent spam
  • Cookie consent banner with opt-in mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Form validation and confirmation dialogs

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Tag Commander
Marketing tools
Tag Commander
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally maintained cultural exhibition platform.
  2. Strong GDPR and cookie compliance with clear consent mechanisms.
  3. Use of modern web technologies and WordPress CMS.
  4. No signs of phishing, malware, or suspicious content.
  5. Contact forms include spam protection and user consent confirmations.
  6. Social media sharing limited to Facebook and email.
  7. No explicit terms of service page found.
  8. No explicit security policy or incident response contact found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform with a well-structured theme and multiple plugins including Formidable Forms for data collection, WPML for multilingual support, and Yoast SEO for search optimization. It uses jQuery and Font Awesome for UI enhancements and Google reCAPTCHA v2 for spam prevention. The site loads external resources from trusted CDNs and employs Tag Commander for tag management and tracking consent. Performance is moderate with room for optimization, but mobile responsiveness and accessibility are well addressed. The site architecture supports clear navigation and content hierarchy, contributing to a positive user experience. Technical risks are minimal but depend on maintaining timely updates and security best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with airt.at. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review airt.at.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.