Skip to main content

Security report for airbnb.tools

Google LLC · Technology · United States

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

83/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The analyzed URL is a Google Accounts sign-in page, part of Google's authentication infrastructure. It serves as an OAuth 2.0 authorization endpoint for users to authenticate with Google services, including enterprise and consumer applications. The page is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and uses modern web technologies and security best practices. It is hosted on Google Cloud Platform and integrates with Google's identity management systems. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced, security headers present, and use of PKCE for OAuth flows. No vulnerabilities or suspicious content were detected. Privacy compliance is moderate given the lack of direct privacy policy links on this specific page, but Google overall maintains comprehensive policies. The domain is a subdomain of google.com, a well-established and trusted domain. Overall, this page is a critical component of Google's identity services and is highly trustworthy.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching airbnb.tools

This scan found 12 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
90
Email security
83
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
83

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Google LLC operates as a global technology leader with a dominant position in internet services and identity management. The accounts.google.com domain is central to Google's authentication ecosystem, supporting billions of users worldwide. The business model revolves around providing secure, scalable identity and access management services integrated with Google's cloud and consumer products. Google leverages its extensive infrastructure and brand trust to maintain market leadership. The OAuth 2.0 implementation supports third-party integrations, enhancing Google's ecosystem. The company is part of Alphabet Inc., a large enterprise with diverse subsidiaries. Google's security and compliance investments underpin its reputation and regulatory adherence.

Security posture

The security posture of the accounts.google.com sign-in page is robust. HTTPS is enforced with strong SSL/TLS configurations. Security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options are implemented to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. The OAuth 2.0 flow uses PKCE to prevent authorization code interception attacks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the page content. The page does not expose contact or incident response information directly but is part of a larger Google security framework. Overall, the page reflects a mature security culture and adherence to best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Add direct links to privacy and cookie policies on the sign-in page to improve privacy compliance transparency.
  2. Include visible contact or support information for security incidents to enhance incident response readiness.
  3. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to ensure no vulnerable libraries are introduced.
  4. Maintain and update security headers and SSL configurations to align with evolving best practices.
  5. Enhance user education on security features during sign-in to improve trust and awareness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Google LLC
Description
Google Accounts sign-in page used for authentication and authorization services.
Key services
User authentication, OAuth 2.0 authorization, Identity management
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, OAuth 2.0, SAML, Google APIs
Frameworks
Google internal frameworks
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
95/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • OAuth 2.0 with PKCE
  • Content Security Policy
  • Secure cookies

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. The URL is a Google accounts sign-in page with OAuth 2.0 parameters.
  2. No WHOIS data available for subdomain accounts.google.com as expected.
  3. Page content is consistent with Google branding and authentication flows.
  4. No contact information or privacy/cookie policies directly on this page.
  5. No advertising or affiliate marketing detected on this page.
  6. Security best practices are implemented including HTTPS and security headers.
  7. No signs of WAF or content blocking detected.
  8. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The page uses a modern JavaScript-heavy front-end with Google proprietary frameworks and APIs. It integrates OAuth 2.0 with PKCE for secure authorization. Hosting is on Google Cloud Platform ensuring high availability and performance. The page is mobile-optimized and accessible with semantic HTML and ARIA roles. SEO optimization is minimal as this is a functional authentication page rather than content-driven. Performance is fast with efficient resource loading from Google's CDN. No CMS is detected as this is a custom Google service page. Technical risks are low given Google's infrastructure but continuous monitoring is recommended.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 83/100 +13Low21 findingsView report
  2. 70/100Medium18 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with airbnb.tools. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review airbnb.tools.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.