Skip to main content

Security report for ainavuarhitektsagrisakons.eu

Ainavu Arhitekts Agris Akons · Other · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ainavu Arhitekts Agris Akons is a small professional landscape architecture service provider based primarily in Latvia with operations extending to the Baltic region and parts of Europe. The company specializes in outdoor space planning, garden and park design, environmental consulting, and CO2 sequestration projects. The website is hosted on Google Sites and integrates various Google services such as YouTube and Google Maps. The technical infrastructure is modern but basic, with no advanced security headers or privacy policies implemented. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but could be improved by adding security headers and formal privacy compliance documentation. Overall, the website presents a professional image but lacks some standard compliance and contact transparency. Strategic recommendations include implementing privacy and cookie policies, enhancing security headers, and providing clear contact and incident response information to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ainavuarhitektsagrisakons.eu

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
65
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in a niche market of landscape architecture and environmental consulting, targeting clients in the Baltic states and Europe. It leverages a service-based business model focusing on personalized consulting, design, and project implementation. The company appears to have a small but experienced team and engages in international collaborations. The website content is well-structured and relevant to its audience but lacks detailed business credentials and certifications. Growth potential exists through enhanced digital presence and compliance improvements. No direct partnerships or subsidiaries are identified from the website content.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others that help mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries was found. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates a compliance gap with GDPR and related regulations. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which limits the site's security transparency. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires enhancements to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add essential security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common attacks.
  3. Provide clear and accessible contact information including company emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility and user trust.
  4. Establish and publish an incident response policy and vulnerability disclosure program to increase security transparency.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO optimization to improve user experience and search engine ranking.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ainavu Arhitekts Agris Akons
Description
Agris Akons is a landscape architect specializing in outdoor space organization, focusing on built-up areas, rural landscapes, and integrating environmental protection and cultural heritage preservation. Services include research, consultation, planning, 3D/4D visualizations, CO2 sequestration projects, garden and park design, planting care, and education. The company operates mainly in Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, and internationally in European cities.
Key services
Landscape architecture consulting, Outdoor space planning and design, 3D and 4D visualizations, CO2 sequestration planting projects, Garden and park design, Planting and garden maintenance, Educational consultations
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Fonts, Google APIs, YouTube embed, Google Maps embed
Platforms
Google Sites
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (implied)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google APIs
Marketing tools
Google Analytics (implied by Google APIs usage)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is built on Google Sites platform with embedded Google services.
  2. No WHOIS public data available due to privacy protection.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  4. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found on the site.
  5. Content is in Latvian language focused on landscape architecture services.
  6. No security incident or vulnerability disclosure information present.
  7. No certifications or formal trust badges displayed.
  8. Site uses HTTPS with no visible security headers.
  9. No WAF or blocking detected; site fully accessible.
  10. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Google Sites platform, utilizing Google Fonts, Google APIs, YouTube embeds, and Google Maps integration. This provides a stable and scalable hosting environment but limits customization and advanced technical controls. The site loads moderately fast and is mobile responsive. However, it lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. No CMS other than Google Sites is detected. The use of multiple Google services indicates reliance on a trusted cloud provider but also implies data sharing with Google. Technical debt is low due to the managed platform but opportunities exist to improve security and compliance configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ainavuarhitektsagrisakons.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ainavuarhitektsagrisakons.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.