Skip to main content

Security report for aibi.lv

SIA Aibi · Manufacturing · Latvia

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA Aibi is a Latvian company specializing in livestock purchase and meat processing with over 20 years of experience. The company operates a modern slaughterhouse and meat processing plant, offering a wide range of fresh, organic, halal, and game meat products. It serves livestock breeders primarily in Latvia, with some operations in Estonia and Lithuania, and has expanded into retail and online sales. The website is built on WordPress and uses common plugins and tracking tools such as Google Analytics and Jetpack. While the site is professionally designed and content-rich, it lacks explicit privacy and cookie policies and security headers, which are areas for improvement. The company holds ISO FSSC 22000 certification, indicating compliance with food safety standards. Overall, the business appears legitimate and well-established, but the lack of WHOIS data limits domain trust verification.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching aibi.lv

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a strong regional market position in the meat processing and livestock purchase sector in Latvia and the Baltic region. Its business model combines B2B livestock procurement with B2C retail and online sales of meat products. The company leverages its own slaughterhouse and processing facilities to ensure quality and control. The presence of organic and halal product lines indicates diversification and targeting of niche markets. The website supports these business operations with clear product and service descriptions, though it lacks some compliance documentation. The partnership with an online shop domain suggests an integrated sales channel. Growth potential exists through enhanced digital presence and compliance improvements.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and uses CAPTCHA on forms, which are positive security practices. However, no security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options were detected, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, and no data protection officer contact is provided. The use of common WordPress plugins requires regular updates to mitigate vulnerabilities. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended headers, policies, and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance protection.
  3. Publish incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress core and plugins to reduce vulnerability risks.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and mobile optimization for better user experience and compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA Aibi
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA Aibi
Description
SIA Aibi is a Latvian company engaged in livestock purchase, meat processing, and retail of meat products. It operates a slaughterhouse and meat processing plant, offering fresh, organic, halal, and game meat products. The company has over 20 years of experience and serves livestock breeders in Latvia, Estonia, and Lithuania.
Key services
Purchase of livestock, Meat processing and production, Organic meat products, Slaughterhouse services, Retail and online sales of meat products
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.5.5, jQuery 3.7.1, Google Analytics, FontAwesome, Contact Form 7, Jetpack
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of CAPTCHA plugin for forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Jetpack Stats
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Jetpack Stats
Marketing tools
Jetpack
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based site with a clear business focus on meat processing and livestock purchase.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error; limits domain trust verification.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the analyzed page.
  4. Contact information includes physical address but no phone or email explicitly found in the content.
  5. Use of Google Analytics and Jetpack for tracking; no advanced privacy compliance mechanisms detected.
  6. No signs of adult or unsafe content; content is business and product focused.
  7. Security headers are not explicitly detected; HTTPS is enabled.
  8. Site uses common plugins like Contact Form 7 and CAPTCHA for forms.
  9. No visible security or incident response policies or contacts.
  10. Certifications include ISO FSSC 22000 indicating food safety standards compliance.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.5.5, using jQuery 3.7.1 and FontAwesome for UI elements. Google Analytics and Jetpack provide analytics and tracking capabilities. Contact Form 7 and CAPTCHA plugins are used for form handling and spam prevention. The site loads external resources from Google Fonts and Twitter widgets. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured navigation. However, the absence of security headers and explicit privacy mechanisms indicates technical debt in security and compliance areas. Hosting provider details are not evident from the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is standard for a small to medium business but requires enhancements for security and privacy.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with aibi.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review aibi.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.