Skip to main content

Security report for aiatsis.gov.au

Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies · Government · Australia

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies (AIATSIS) is Australia's sole national institution dedicated to the history, culture, and heritage of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. It operates as a government-funded entity providing extensive research, educational resources, and cultural heritage services. The website reflects a strong market position as a trusted custodian and leader in Indigenous Australian studies, targeting researchers, educators, Indigenous communities, and the general public. Key services include family history research support, collection access, educational curriculum resources, and cultural heritage repatriation programs. Technically, the website is built on Drupal 10 with modern JavaScript libraries and integrates Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices, with a moderate performance profile. Hosting details are not explicitly stated but the domain is managed by the Australian Department of Finance with DNS via netregistry.net. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS with strong SSL configuration and uses Content Security Policy nonces to mitigate script injection risks. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and there is no visible cookie consent mechanism or published vulnerability disclosure policy. The WHOIS data confirms the domain is registered to a legitimate government entity with domain status protections, enhancing trustworthiness. Overall, AIATSIS's website is professional, content-rich, and secure, with minor gaps in privacy compliance and vulnerability disclosure. It serves as a reliable digital platform for Indigenous cultural and research engagement in Australia.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      SPF DNS Lookup Limit Exceeded

      SPF record requires 11 DNS lookups (max 10)

      What to do: Reduce includes and mechanisms to stay under limit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching aiatsis.gov.au

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
70
Email security
65
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

AIATSIS holds a unique position as a government institution focused on Indigenous Australian studies, with a comprehensive collection and research portfolio. Its business model is non-commercial, funded by government resources, and it supports education, research, and cultural preservation. The institution leverages partnerships, such as its official shop domain, to distribute publications and products. The website's extensive content and structured navigation indicate a mature digital presence aimed at diverse stakeholders including Indigenous communities, academics, and educators. The organization's governance and structure are transparent, supporting credibility and operational stability.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and use of CSP nonces. Security headers are partially confirmed, and no critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of DNSSEC is a minor gap, and the lack of a public vulnerability disclosure or incident response contact reduces transparency. Analytics and tracking scripts are present but standard for institutional websites. Overall, the security posture is strong for a government site but could be improved with enhanced DNS security and formal vulnerability disclosure mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS integrity and security.
  2. Implement a cookie consent banner or mechanism to comply with privacy best practices and regulations.
  3. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to enhance transparency and incident response readiness.
  4. Add explicit security headers such as X-Frame-Options and Content-Security-Policy HTTP headers if not already configured at server level.
  5. Provide clear incident response contact information on the security or contact pages.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies
Description
Australia's only national institution focused exclusively on the diverse history, cultures and heritage of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australia.
Key services
Research projects and publications, Family history resources, Collection access and preservation, Educational curriculum resources, Cultural heritage repatriation, Public events and exhibitions
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal 10, jQuery, Slick Carousel, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, AddToAny sharing
Frameworks
Drupal
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of CSP nonce
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security status page linked

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
AddToAny
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a government institution site focused on Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander studies.
  2. Content is rich, well-structured, and professionally presented.
  3. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity.
  4. Social media presence is official and consistent.
  5. Security posture is strong with HTTPS and CSP nonce usage.
  6. Lack of explicit cookie consent mechanism and vulnerability disclosure page.
  7. WHOIS data confirms government ownership and domain protection status.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal 10 CMS, utilizing jQuery and Slick Carousel for UI components. It integrates Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing. The site uses modern CSS and JavaScript libraries, with responsive design and accessibility features. Performance is moderate, likely due to rich media content and third-party scripts. Hosting appears stable and managed under Australian government infrastructure. There is opportunity to improve DNS security with DNSSEC and optimize privacy compliance with cookie consent mechanisms.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with aiatsis.gov.au. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review aiatsis.gov.au.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.