Skip to main content

Security report for agtech.lv

SIA AgTech · Manufacturing · Latvia

Partial score · DNS & email only

75/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA AgTech is a Latvian company specializing in precision agriculture products and services, including soil analysis, GPS systems, drones, nitrogen sensors, software, and agricultural instruments. The website targets agricultural businesses and farmers in Latvia, offering a range of specialized products and services to enhance farming efficiency and productivity. The company maintains an active social media presence and integrates modern analytics and marketing tools on its website. Technically, the website is built on a CMS platform with modern JavaScript libraries and supports PWA features via service workers. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced, but lacks some security headers and explicit incident response information. Privacy compliance is basic with a privacy policy and cookie consent banner present. Overall, the website is professional, well-structured, and trustworthy, though WHOIS data is unavailable for full domain legitimacy verification.

Scanned

3 of 7 checks could not complete. The site may be unreachable or blocking automated scans, so the results below cover only what could be checked. Try a rescan later.

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
Not assessed
GDPR outside view
Not assessed

Both readouts depend on the site's pages, which could not be loaded in this scan.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching agtech.lv

This scan found 15 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
Average
78
After the cap
75

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the manufacturing and technology sectors focused on agriculture. Its business model includes direct sales and service provision to agricultural clients. The website content and navigation are clear and professional, supporting a small-sized business profile. The integration of social media and analytics tools indicates a moderate digital marketing strategy. Absence of detailed contact information and WHOIS data limits full business transparency. No suspicious or fraudulent indicators were found. The company appears to be a niche player in the Latvian precision agriculture market with a focus on technology-driven farming solutions.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS and modern tracking scripts such as Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel. It registers a service worker for PWA functionality, indicating some level of modern web security practices. However, the absence of security headers like Content-Security-Policy and lack of visible vulnerability disclosure or incident response contacts suggest room for improvement. No exposed sensitive data or known vulnerabilities were detected in the HTML content. The security score is moderate, reflecting a generally secure but improvable posture.

Recommendations

  1. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  3. Provide explicit contact information for incident response or security concerns to improve trust and readiness.
  4. Enhance privacy compliance by detailing data retention policies and user rights in the privacy policy.
  5. Regularly monitor and update third-party scripts and libraries to avoid vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA AgTech
Description
Augsnes analīzes, GPS sistēmas, traktoru piekabes, slāpekļa sensori, programmatūras, lauksaimniecības mērinstrumenti, meteostacijas u.c. precīzās lauksaimniecības produkti un pakalpojumi.
Key services
Augsnes analīzes (Soil analysis), GPS sistēmas (GPS systems), Traktoru piekabes (Tractor trailers), Slāpekļa sensori (Nitrogen sensors), Programmatūras (Software), Lauksaimniecības mērinstrumenti (Agricultural measuring instruments), Meteostacijas (Weather stations), Droni un roboti (Drones and robots), Ražas uzskaite un kartēšana (Yield accounting and mapping)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, jQuery, Skrollr.js, Ecwid e-commerce script, Service Worker for PWA
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Service Worker registered for PWA
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Latvian language.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error; domain registration details unknown.
  3. Privacy policy and cookie consent mechanisms are implemented.
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the provided HTML snippet.
  5. Social media presence is active on Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube.
  6. Website uses modern tracking and analytics tools.
  7. No visible security headers detected in the HTML source.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information found.
  9. Content is focused on precision agriculture products and services.
  10. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a CMS platform (likely Multiscreensite) with integration of popular JavaScript libraries including jQuery and Skrollr.js for animations. It uses Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing. The site supports PWA features via service workers, improving user experience on mobile devices. Performance is moderate with some optimization opportunities. Mobile responsiveness and SEO meta tags are well implemented. No major technical debt or outdated technologies were detected. Hosting provider details are not evident from the HTML content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with agtech.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review agtech.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.